De Houwer J, Baeyens F, Vansteenwegen D, Eelen P
Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, United Kingdom.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Apr;26(2):237-42. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.2.237.
Human participants were allocated to 1 of 3 groups. In the conditioning group, each conditioned stimulus (CS)-unconditioned stimulus (US) pair was presented 7 times during the acquisition phase. Participants who were assigned to the extinction group saw 5 additional presentations of each CS in isolation after the 7 presentations of each CS-US pair. In the latent inhibition group, the CS-only trials were presented before the CS-US trials. Overall, a significant evaluative conditioning effect was observed. This effect cannot be dismissed on the basis of the arguments developed by A. P. Field and G. C. L. Davey (1997, 1998, 1999), and the results thus provide strong evidence for the associative nature of evaluative conditioning. The results are also in line with other findings, which showed that evaluative conditioning is resistant to extinction.
人类参与者被分配到3组中的1组。在条件作用组中，每个条件刺激（CS）-非条件刺激（US）对在习得阶段呈现7次。被分配到消退组的参与者在每个CS-US对呈现7次后，还单独看到每个CS额外呈现5次。在潜伏抑制组中，仅CS试验在CS-US试验之前呈现。总体而言，观察到了显著的评价性条件作用效应。基于A.P.菲尔德和G.C.L.戴维（1997年、1998年、1999年）提出的论点，这种效应不能被忽视，因此这些结果为评价性条件作用的联想性质提供了有力证据。这些结果也与其他研究结果一致，这些研究表明评价性条件作用对消退具有抗性。
