Theurl E
Department of Public Finance, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Health Care Anal. 1999;7(4):331-54. doi: 10.1023/A:1009426731833.
The health care systems in Austria, Germany and Switzerland owe their institutional structure to different historical developments. While Austria and Germany voted for the Bismarck-Model of social health insurance, Switzerland adopted a voluntary system of health insurance. In all three countries, until very recently, the different challenges which the health care sector faced were met by piecemeal approaches and by stop and go policies, which, in the long run were not very successful either in containing costs or in improving efficacy and efficiency. During the 1990 more fundamental reforms in the health care systems of all three countries took place. Germany and Switzerland chose the path of deregulation of the health insurance system, which consequently strengthened the competition between the insurance companies, and, to some extent between the suppliers of medical services. While this can be seen as an essential part of the reform process for these two countries. Austria favors a state-oriented and interventionist approach in order to meet the challenges.
奥地利、德国和瑞士的医疗保健系统,其制度结构源于不同的历史发展。奥地利和德国选择了俾斯麦式的社会医疗保险模式,而瑞士则采用了自愿医疗保险制度。直到最近,在这三个国家中,医疗保健部门所面临的不同挑战都是通过零敲碎打的方式以及走走停停的政策来应对的,从长远来看,这些政策在控制成本、提高效力和效率方面都不太成功。在20世纪90年代,这三个国家的医疗保健系统都进行了更根本性的改革。德国和瑞士选择了医疗保险系统放松管制的道路,这相应地增强了保险公司之间的竞争,在一定程度上也增强了医疗服务供应商之间的竞争。虽然这可以被视为这两个国家改革进程的一个重要部分,但奥地利则倾向于采取以国家为导向的干预主义方法来应对挑战。