Jablensky A, McGrath J, Herrman H, Castle D, Gureje O, Evans M, Carr V, Morgan V, Korten A, Harvey C
The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;34(2):221-36. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00728.x.
This paper reports on a study designed within the framework of the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing to: estimate the prevalence of psychoses in urban areas of Australia; identify profiles of symptomatology, impairments and disabilities; collect information on services received and needed; and explore quality of life issues in a broadly representative sample of people with psychotic illnesses.
The study was conducted over four areas in the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia, as a two-phase survey: (i) a census and screening for psychosis of all individuals who made contacts with mental health services during a period of 1 month in 1997; and (ii) interviews with a stratified random sample (n=980) of the screen-positive individuals (n=3800) using a standardised instrument.
The point prevalence (1 month) of psychotic disorders in the urban population aged 18-64 is in the range of 4-7 per 1000 with a weighted mean of 4.7 per 1000. People with psychotic disorders experience high rates of functional impairments and disability, decreased quality of life, persistent symptoms, substance-use comorbidity and frequent side effects of medication. Although the utilisation of hospital-based and community mental health services, as well as of public and non-governmental helping agencies, is high, the majority live in extreme social isolation and adverse socioeconomic circumstances. Among the many unmet needs, the limited availability of community-based rehabilitation, supported accommodation and employment opportunities is particularly prominent.
The so-called 'low-prevalence' psychotic disorders represent a major and complex public health problem, associated with heavy personal and social costs. There is a need for a broad programmatic approach, involving various sectors of the community, to tackle the multiple dimensions of clinical disorder, personal functioning and socioeconomic environment that influence the course and outcome of psychosis and ultimately determine the effectiveness of service-based intervention.
本文报告了一项在澳大利亚全国心理健康与幸福调查框架内开展的研究,旨在:估计澳大利亚城市地区精神病的患病率;确定症状、损伤和残疾的特征;收集有关已接受和所需服务的信息;并在具有广泛代表性的精神病患者样本中探讨生活质量问题。
该研究在澳大利亚首都领地、昆士兰州、维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州的四个地区进行,作为一项两阶段调查:(i)对1997年1个月内与心理健康服务机构有接触的所有个体进行普查和精神病筛查;(ii)使用标准化工具对筛查呈阳性的个体(n = 3800)中的分层随机样本(n = 980)进行访谈。
18 - 64岁城市人口中精神病性障碍的时点患病率(1个月)在每1000人4 - 7例范围内,加权平均值为每1000人4.7例。患有精神病性障碍的人功能损伤和残疾率高、生活质量下降、症状持续、存在物质使用共病以及药物副作用频繁。尽管对基于医院和社区的心理健康服务以及公共和非政府帮助机构的利用率很高,但大多数人生活在极度社会隔离和不利的社会经济环境中。在众多未满足的需求中,基于社区的康复、支持性住宿和就业机会的有限可得性尤为突出。
所谓的“低患病率”精神病性障碍是一个重大且复杂的公共卫生问题,伴有沉重的个人和社会成本。需要一种广泛的规划方法,涉及社区的各个部门,以应对影响精神病病程和结局并最终决定基于服务的干预效果的临床障碍、个人功能和社会经济环境的多个层面。