• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麦对网斑病抗性多个基因的遗传及随机扩增多态性DNA标记

Inheritance and RAPD tagging of multiple genes for resistance to net blotch in barley.

作者信息

Molnar S J, James L E, Kasha K J

机构信息

Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Genome. 2000 Apr;43(2):224-31.

PMID:10791809
Abstract

A doubled haploid barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) population that was created from a cross between cultivars 'Léger' and 'CI 9831' was characterized by RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) markers for resistance to isolate WRS857 of Pyrenophora teres Drechs. f. sp. maculata Smedeg., the causal agent of the spot form of net blotch. Resistance, which initially appeared to be conferred by a single gene from the approximate 1:1 (resistant : susceptible) segregation ratio of the doubled-haploid (DH) progeny, was found to be associated with three different genomic regions by RAPD analysis. Of 500 RAPD random primers that were screened against the parents, 195 revealed polymorphic bands, seven showed an association to the resistance in bulks, and these seven markers were mapped to three unlinked genomic regions. Two of these regions, one of which was mapped to chromosome 2, have major resistance genes. The third region has some homology to the chromosome 2 region. This study demonstrates the simultaneous location of markers for more than one gene governing a trait by using RAPD and bulked segregant analysis (BSA).

摘要

通过将品种“Léger”和“CI 9831”杂交构建了一个双单倍体大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)群体,利用随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)标记对其进行了特征分析,以检测对网斑病菌斑点型病原菌Pyrenophora teres Drechs. f. sp. maculata Smedeg.的分离株WRS857的抗性。抗性最初似乎由一个单基因控制,这是根据双单倍体(DH)后代大约1:1(抗性:感病)的分离比例判断的,但通过RAPD分析发现抗性与三个不同的基因组区域相关。在针对亲本筛选的500个RAPD随机引物中,195个显示出多态性条带,7个在混合群体中显示出与抗性相关,并且这7个标记被定位到三个不连锁的基因组区域。其中两个区域,其中一个被定位到2号染色体,含有主要抗性基因。第三个区域与2号染色体区域有一些同源性。本研究通过使用RAPD和混合分离群体分析(BSA)证明了控制一个性状的多个基因的标记可以同时定位。

相似文献

1
Inheritance and RAPD tagging of multiple genes for resistance to net blotch in barley.大麦对网斑病抗性多个基因的遗传及随机扩增多态性DNA标记
Genome. 2000 Apr;43(2):224-31.
2
Mapping of major spot-type and net-type net-blotch resistance genes in the Ethiopian barley line CI 9819.埃塞俄比亚大麦品系CI 9819中主要斑点型和网斑型网斑病抗性基因的定位
Genome. 2006 Dec;49(12):1564-71. doi: 10.1139/g06-119.
3
Identification of RAPD markers for common root rot and spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) resistance in barley.大麦中抗根腐病和斑点叶枯病(禾旋孢腔菌)的随机扩增多态性DNA标记鉴定
Genome. 1996 Feb;39(1):206-15. doi: 10.1139/g96-027.
4
A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistance.大麦6H染色体的一个区域含有多个与网斑病抗性相关的主要基因。
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Nov;117(8):1261-70. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0860-x. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
5
Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with barley net blotch resistance.定位与大麦网斑病抗性相关的数量性状基因座。
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Feb;116(4):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0688-9. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
6
SNPs associated with barley resistance to isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. teres.与大麦抗禾谷镰刀菌分离物相关的 SNPs。
BMC Genomics. 2019 May 8;20(Suppl 3):292. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5623-3.
7
Genetics of resistance to anthracnose and identification of AFLP and RAPD markers linked to the resistance gene in PI 320937 germplasm of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus).小扁豆(Lens culinaris Medikus)PI 320937种质对炭疽病抗性的遗传分析及与抗性基因连锁的AFLP和RAPD标记的鉴定
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Feb;106(3):428-34. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1042-x. Epub 2002 Sep 19.
8
Association mapping of seedling resistance to spot form net blotch in a worldwide collection of barley.对全球大麦种质资源中幼苗对网斑病抗性的关联分析
Phytopathology. 2015 Apr;105(4):500-8. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-14-0106-R.
9
Identification and chromosomal location of major genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres in a doubled-haploid barley population.在一个双单倍体大麦群体中对网斑病菌抗性主要基因的鉴定及染色体定位
Genome. 2006 Jul;49(7):855-9. doi: 10.1139/g06-024.
10
High-resolution mapping of the Rym4/Rym5 locus conferring resistance to the barley yellow mosaic virus complex (BaMMV, BaYMV, BaYMV-2) in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.).赋予大麦(Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.)对大麦黄花叶病毒复合体(BaMMV、BaYMV、BaYMV-2)抗性的Rym4/Rym5基因座的高分辨率定位。
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Jan;110(2):283-93. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1832-4. Epub 2004 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Research advances in the Pyrenophora teres-barley interaction.大麦生壳二孢菌互作的研究进展。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2020 Feb;21(2):272-288. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12896. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Mapping of barley susceptibility/resistance QTL against spot form net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres f. maculata using RIL populations.利用 RIL 群体定位大麦对叶枯病的感病/抗性 QTL。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jul;132(7):1953-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03328-x. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Characterizing the f. -Barley Interaction Using Pathogen Genetics.
利用病原体遗传学表征大麦与叶锈菌的相互作用 。 (注:原文中“f.”可能有误,推测可能是“f. sp. hordei”,即叶锈菌大麦专化型,完整准确表述为利用病原体遗传学表征大麦与叶锈菌大麦专化型的相互作用 ,不过按照要求仅按原文翻译)
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Aug 7;7(8):2615-2626. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.043265.
4
Spot form of net blotch resistance in barley is under complex genetic control.大麦中斑点型网斑病抗性受复杂的遗传控制。
Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Mar;128(3):489-99. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2447-z. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
5
Draft genome sequence, and a sequence-defined genetic linkage map of the legume crop species Lupinus angustifolius L.豆科作物窄叶羽扇豆 L. 的基因组草图序列和序列定义的遗传连锁图谱
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064799. Print 2013.
6
Application of next-generation sequencing for rapid marker development in molecular plant breeding: a case study on anthracnose disease resistance in Lupinus angustifolius L.下一代测序在分子植物育种中快速标记开发的应用:以窄叶羽扇豆对炭疽病抗性为例
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jul 17;13:318. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-318.
7
Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen.禾谷丝核菌:一种危害性日益增加的大麦病原菌。
Mol Plant Pathol. 2011 Jan;12(1):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00649.x.