Suppr超能文献

儿童术前口服麻醉用药:咪达唑仑与氯胺酮联合用药对比单独使用咪达唑仑或氯胺酮的双盲随机研究。

Oral preanaesthetic medication for children: double-blind randomized study of a combination of midazolam and ketamine vs midazolam or ketamine alone.

作者信息

Funk W, Jakob W, Riedl T, Taeger K

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;84(3):335-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013435.

Abstract

Anxiolysis and sedation with oral midazolam are common practice in paediatric anaesthesia. However, good or excellent results are seen in only 50-80% of cases. For this reason, we investigated if addition of a low dose of oral ketamine (MIKE: ketamine 3 mg kg-1, midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1) resulted in better premedication compared with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg-1 or ketamine 6 mg kg-1 alone, in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. We studied 120 children (mean age 5.7 (range 2-10) yr) undergoing surgery of more than 30 min duration. After oral premedication in the ward and transfer, the child's condition in the induction room was evaluated by assigning 1-4 points to the quality of anxiolysis, sedation, behaviour at separation from parent and during venepuncture (transfer score). On days 1 and 7 after operation, parents were interviewed for changes in behaviour (eating, sleep, dreams, toilet training), recollection and satisfaction, using a standardized questionnaire. The groups were similar in age, sex, weight, intervention and duration of anaesthesia. The transfer score was significantly better in the MIKE group (12.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.9-13.1)) than in the ketamine or midazolam groups (10.6 (9.8-11.4) and 11.5 (10.7-12.3), respectively). Success rates for anxiolysis and behaviour at separation were greater than 90% with the combination, approximately 70% with midazolam and only 51% with ketamine alone. The incidence of salivation, excitation and psychotic symptoms was low in all groups. Vertigo and emesis before induction were significantly more frequent after ketamine premedication. During recovery, there were no differences in sedation or time of possible discharge. After 1 week, parents reported nightmares (ketamine five, midazolam three, MIKE one), restless sleep (five/four/four) or negative memories (three/four/one). There were no major or continuing disturbances in behaviour or development. In summary, significantly better anxiolysis and separation were observed with a combination of ketamine and midazolam, even in awake children (sedation was not successful according to the preset criteria), than with midazolam or ketamine alone. Duration of action and side effects of the combination were similar to those of midazolam. The combination of both drugs in strawberry flavoured glucose syrup (pH 4.5 approximately) is chemically stable for 8 weeks.

摘要

口服咪达唑仑进行抗焦虑和镇静是小儿麻醉中的常见做法。然而,只有50 - 80%的病例能取得良好或极佳效果。因此,我们在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中调查了添加低剂量口服氯胺酮(MIKE方案:氯胺酮3 mg/kg,咪达唑仑0.5 mg/kg)与单独使用0.5 mg/kg口服咪达唑仑或6 mg/kg氯胺酮相比,是否能带来更好的术前用药效果。我们研究了120名接受时长超过30分钟手术的儿童(平均年龄5.7岁(范围2 - 10岁))。在病房口服术前用药并转运后,通过对诱导室中儿童的抗焦虑、镇静、与父母分离时及静脉穿刺时的行为质量评定1 - 4分(转运评分)来评估其状况。在术后第1天和第7天,使用标准化问卷对父母进行访谈,了解孩子行为(饮食、睡眠、梦境、如厕训练)、回忆及满意度的变化。各研究组在年龄、性别、体重、干预措施及麻醉时长方面相似。MIKE组的转运评分(12.5(95%置信区间(CI)11.9 - 13.1))显著优于氯胺酮组或咪达唑仑组(分别为10.6(9.8 - 11.4)和11.5(10.7 - 12.3))。联合用药时抗焦虑及分离时行为的成功率大于90%,咪达唑仑组约为70%,单独使用氯胺酮组仅为51%。所有组流涎、兴奋及精神症状的发生率均较低。氯胺酮术前用药后诱导前眩晕和呕吐的发生率显著更高。恢复期间,镇静或可能出院时间方面无差异。1周后,父母报告有噩梦(氯胺酮组5例,咪达唑仑组3例,MIKE组1例)、睡眠不安(5/4/4)或负面记忆(3/4/1)。行为或发育方面无重大或持续的干扰。总之,即使在清醒儿童中(根据预设标准镇静未成功),氯胺酮与咪达唑仑联合使用时的抗焦虑和分离效果显著优于单独使用咪达唑仑或氯胺酮。联合用药的作用时长和副作用与咪达唑仑相似。两种药物在草莓味葡萄糖糖浆(pH约4.5)中联合化学稳定性可达8周。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验