Gancheva A, Pot B, Vanhonacker K, Hoste B, Kersters K
BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Laboratory of Microbiology, Universiteit Gent, Belgium.
Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999 Dec;22(4):573-85. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80011-3.
A set of 98 strains belonging to nine species of the Lactobacillus acidophilus rRNA-group have been analysed by SDS-PAGE of cellular proteins, RAPD-PCR and AFLP with fluorescently labeled primers in order to find improved methods for their identification. Strains of the following phenotypically highly similar species were examined: L. acidophilus, L. amylovorus, L. crispatus, L. johnsonii, L. gasseri, L. gallinarum, L. helveticus, L. iners and L. amylolyticus. Although the majority of the species can be differentiated by SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins, the latter technique showed poor discrimination between L. gasseri and L. johnsonii strains and between some strains of L. amylovorus and L. gallinarum. However, this study shows that the RAPD-PCR (using at least 3 different primers followed by numerical analysis of the combined patterns) and AFLP are most suitable genomic fingerprinting techniques for the differentiation of all the species listed above, and that databases for identification can be constructed, particularly when commercially available molecular tool-kits are used. The separate species status of the recently described L. amylolyticus and L. iners was fully confirmed.
为了找到改进的嗜酸乳杆菌rRNA组九个种的98株菌株的鉴定方法,我们通过细胞蛋白的SDS-PAGE、RAPD-PCR和用荧光标记引物的AFLP对其进行了分析。对以下表型高度相似的种的菌株进行了检测:嗜酸乳杆菌、解淀粉乳杆菌、卷曲乳杆菌、约氏乳杆菌、加氏乳杆菌、鸡乳杆菌、瑞士乳杆菌、惰性乳杆菌和溶淀粉乳杆菌。尽管大多数种可以通过全细胞蛋白的SDS-PAGE进行区分,但后一种技术在加氏乳杆菌和约氏乳杆菌菌株之间以及一些解淀粉乳杆菌和鸡乳杆菌菌株之间的区分效果较差。然而,本研究表明,RAPD-PCR(使用至少3种不同引物,随后对组合模式进行数值分析)和AFLP是用于区分上述所有种的最合适的基因组指纹技术,并且可以构建鉴定数据库,特别是当使用市售分子工具试剂盒时。最近描述的溶淀粉乳杆菌和惰性乳杆菌的独立种地位得到了充分证实。