Sicilia A, Enrile F J, Buitrago P, Zubizarreta J
Section of Periodontology, School of Stomatology, University of Oviedo, Spain.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Mar-Apr;15(2):272-7.
The fabrication of a complete maxillary implant-supported prosthesis in a patient with slight resorption of the alveolar ridge and a high lip line presents a professional challenge. The implants must be placed with high precision to achieve good esthetics, phonetics, and function. A fixed surgical template using microimplants has been developed for this purpose. The objective of this investigation was to compare a fixed surgical template (FST) to a conventional movable surgical template (MST) for the precise placement of implants in the slightly resorbed edentulous maxilla. Three patients (28 implants), edentulous in the maxilla, with slight ridge resorption, in whom the implants were placed with an FST, were compared with 5 controls having the same characteristics and implants placed with an MST (35 implants). After completion of the prosthesis, occlusal photographs (1:1) were taken, and these images were scanned and transferred to a drawing program in which the contours of the teeth, the ideal emergence position of the occlusal hole of the abutment screw, and its real position were drawn. A blind evaluation was made using the following variables: frequency of location of the abutment screw hole outside of the tooth contour, and the relative measurements of the area of coincidence between the circle that represents the ideal position and real position. A significantly smaller frequency of implants outside the tooth contour was seen with the FST (7%) than with the MST (46%) (P < .0008). Also, a significantly higher relative area of coincidence was observed between ideal position and real position in the FST (0.61) than in the MST (0.38) (P < .003). This study revealed that considerably higher precision was associated with the use of an FST.
为一位牙槽嵴轻度吸收且唇线较高的患者制作完整的上颌种植支持式修复体是一项专业挑战。种植体必须高精度植入,以实现良好的美观、语音和功能效果。为此已开发出一种使用微型种植体的固定式手术模板。本研究的目的是比较固定式手术模板(FST)和传统的可移动手术模板(MST)在轻度吸收的无牙上颌中精确植入种植体的效果。将3例上颌无牙且牙槽嵴轻度吸收、使用FST植入种植体的患者(28颗种植体)与5例具有相同特征且使用MST植入种植体的对照患者(35颗种植体)进行比较。修复体完成后,拍摄咬合照片(1:1),扫描这些图像并将其传输到绘图程序中,在该程序中绘制牙齿轮廓、基台螺丝咬合孔的理想穿出位置及其实际位置。使用以下变量进行盲法评估:基台螺丝孔位于牙齿轮廓外的频率,以及代表理想位置和实际位置的圆之间重合面积的相对测量值。与MST(46%)相比,FST(7%)显示种植体位于牙齿轮廓外的频率显著更低(P <.0008)。此外,FST(0.61)中理想位置与实际位置之间的相对重合面积显著高于MST(0.38)(P <.003)。本研究表明,使用FST具有显著更高的精度。