Suarez-Almazor M E, Belseck E, Shea B, Wells G, Tugwell P
Health Services Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mailbox Station 152, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77024, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000957.
To estimate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group trials register, and Medline, up to July 1997, using the search strategy developed by the Cochrane Collaboration (Dickersin 1994). The search was complemented with bibliography searching of the reference list of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. Key experts in the area were contacted for further published and unpublished articles.
Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing MTX against placebo in patients with RA.
Two reviewers determined the studies to be included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (GW, MSA). Data were independently abstracted by two reviewers (EB, MSA), and checked by a third reviewer (BS) using a pre-developed form for the rheumatoid arthritis sub-group of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group. The same two reviewers, using a validated scale (Jadad 1996) assessed the methodological quality of the trials independently. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for joint counts, pain, and global and functional assessments. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios (OR) for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout and random effects for outcomes showing heterogeneity.
Five trials and 300 patients were included. A statistically significant benefit was observed for MTX when compared to placebo. Statistically significant differences were observed for all measures except ESR. The standardized weighted difference (effect size) between MTX and placebo for the various outcome measures varied between -0.43 and -1.5. No differences were observed in the total number of withdrawals and dropouts (OR = 0.95), although patients on MTX were three times more likely to discontinue treatment because of adverse reactions (OR=3.47) and four times less likely to withdraw due to lack of response (OR=0.22).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-two percent of people on MTX withdrew due to adverse effects compared to seven percent of the placebo group. MTX has a substantial clinically and statistically significant benefit in the short term treatment of patients with RA.
评估甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的短期疗效和毒性。
我们使用Cochrane协作网制定的检索策略(Dickersin 1994),检索了截至1997年7月的Cochrane肌肉骨骼组试验注册库和Medline。通过对电子检索获得的试验参考文献列表进行文献检索来补充搜索。联系该领域的关键专家以获取更多已发表和未发表的文章。
比较MTX与安慰剂治疗RA患者的随机对照试验和对照临床试验。
两名评审员根据纳入和排除标准确定纳入的研究(GW,MSA)。数据由两名评审员(EB,MSA)独立提取,并由第三名评审员(BS)使用Cochrane肌肉骨骼组类风湿关节炎亚组预先制定的表格进行检查。同样的两名评审员使用经过验证的量表(Jadad 1996)独立评估试验的方法学质量。从出版物中提取类风湿关节炎的结局指标。采用标准化均数差(SMD)对关节计数、疼痛以及整体和功能评估进行汇总分析。对红细胞沉降率(ESR)采用加权均数差(WMD)。用汇总比值比(OR)评估毒性导致的撤药情况。采用卡方检验评估试验间的异质性。全程使用固定效应模型,对显示异质性的结局采用随机效应模型。
纳入5项试验,共300例患者。与安慰剂相比,MTX有显著的获益。除ESR外,所有指标均有显著差异。MTX与安慰剂在各种结局指标上的标准化加权差异(效应量)在-0.43至-1.5之间。撤药和退出研究的总数无差异(OR = 0.95),尽管接受MTX治疗的患者因不良反应而停药的可能性是安慰剂组的3倍(OR = 3.47),因无反应而退出的可能性是安慰剂组的四分之一(OR = 0.22)。
接受MTX治疗的患者中有22%因不良反应退出,而安慰剂组为7%。MTX在RA患者的短期治疗中具有显著的临床和统计学获益。