Rowe B H, Spooner C H, Ducharme F M, Bretzlaff J A, Bota G W
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 1G1 Walter Mackenzie Centre, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000195.
Acute asthma is responsible for many emergency department visits annually. Between 12-16% will relapse to require additional interventions within two weeks of ED discharge. Treatment of acute asthma is based on rapid reversal of bronchospasm and reducing airway inflammation and this review examines the evidence for using systemic corticosteroids to improve outcomes after discharge from the ED.
To determine the benefit of corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous) for the treatment of asthmatic patients discharged from an acute care setting (i.e. usually the emergency department) after assessment and treatment of an acute asthmatic exacerbation.
The Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register was searched using the terms: a) Asthma OR Wheez* b) Glucocorticoid OR Steroid* AND c) Exacerbat* OR Relapse* OR Emerg*. In addition, authors of all included studies were contacted to determine if unpublished studies which met the inclusion criteria were available. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched for additional citations.
Only randomized controlled trials were eligible for selection. Studies were included in this review if they dealt with the outpatient treatment of asthmatic exacerbations using glucocorticoids at discharge and reported either relapse rate or PFTs. Two independent reviewers first identified potentially relevant studies and then selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers. Agreement was assessed using kappa (k) statistics.
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers; authors were contacted to verify the extracted data and clarify missing information. When author contact was unsuccessful, missing data were estimated from graphs where possible. Sensitivity, sub-group and overall analyses were performed using the Cochrane Review Manager.
A search that yielded 229 references identified 169 (73%) original publications. Reviewers identified 8 studies for potential inclusion (k =0.76); 18 references were added by searching publication reference lists and contact with authors. Of these 26 articles, a total of 7 were included in the overview. Two studies used intramuscular corticosteroids, five studies used oral corticosteroids. Significantly fewer patients in the corticosteroid group relapsed to receive additional care in the first week (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17, 0.73). This favourable effect was maintained over the first 21 days (OR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.82). Patients receiving corticosteroids had less need for beta-agonists (weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.3 activations/day; 95% CI: -5.5, -1.0). Changes in pulmonary function tests (SMD 0.045; 95% CI: -0.47, 0.56) and side effects (SMD 0.03; 95% CI : -0.38, 0.44) in the first 7-10 days, while rarely reported, showed no differences between the treatment groups. Statistically significant heterogeneity was identified for the side effect results; all other outcomes were homogeneous. It appears that IM corticosteroids are similarly efficacious to a 7-10 day tapering course of oral agents. From these results, as few as 13 patients need to be treated to prevent relapse to additional care after an exacerbation of asthma.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A short course of corticosteroids following assessment for an acute exacerbation of asthma significantly reduces the number of relapses to additional care and decreases beta-agonist use without an apparent increase in side effects. Intramuscular corticosteroids appear as effective as oral agents.
急性哮喘每年导致大量患者前往急诊科就诊。12% - 16%的患者在急诊科出院后两周内会复发,需要额外的干预措施。急性哮喘的治疗基于迅速逆转支气管痉挛和减轻气道炎症,本综述探讨了使用全身糖皮质激素改善急诊科出院后患者预后的证据。
确定糖皮质激素(口服、肌肉注射或静脉注射)对在急性哮喘加重发作经过评估和治疗后从急性护理机构(通常为急诊科)出院的哮喘患者的治疗效果。
使用以下检索词检索Cochrane Airways Group的“Asthma and Wheez* RCT”注册库:a)哮喘或喘息*;b)糖皮质激素或类固醇*;c)加重或复发或急诊*。此外,还联系了所有纳入研究的作者,以确定是否有符合纳入标准的未发表研究。同时也检索了纳入研究的参考文献、已知综述和文献,以获取更多引用文献。
仅纳入随机对照试验。如果研究涉及出院时使用糖皮质激素对哮喘加重发作进行门诊治疗,并报告了复发率或肺功能测试结果,则纳入本综述。两名独立评审员首先确定潜在相关研究,然后选择纳入的文章。两名评审员独立评估方法学质量。使用kappa(k)统计量评估一致性。
两名评审员独立提取数据;联系作者核实提取的数据并澄清缺失信息。当无法联系到作者时,尽可能从图表中估计缺失数据。使用Cochrane Review Manager进行敏感性分析、亚组分析和总体分析。
检索到229篇参考文献,其中169篇(73%)为原始出版物。评审员确定了8项可能纳入的研究(k = 0.76);通过检索出版物参考文献列表和联系作者又增加了18篇参考文献。在这26篇文章中,共有7篇纳入综述。两项研究使用肌肉注射糖皮质激素,五项研究使用口服糖皮质激素。糖皮质激素组在第一周复发并接受额外治疗的患者明显较少(优势比(OR)0.35;95%置信区间(CI):0.17,0.73)。这种有利效果在最初21天内持续存在(OR 0.33;95% CI:0.13,0.82)。接受糖皮质激素治疗的患者对β - 激动剂的需求较少(加权平均差(WMD)-3.3次/天;95% CI:-5.5,-1.0)。在最初7 - 10天内,肺功能测试的变化(标准化均数差(SMD)0.045;95% CI:-0.47,0.56)和副作用(SMD 0.03;95% CI:-0.38,0.44)虽然很少报告,但治疗组之间没有差异。副作用结果存在统计学上的显著异质性;所有其他结果均具有同质性。肌肉注射糖皮质激素似乎与口服药物7 - 10天的逐渐减量疗程效果相似。根据这些结果,在哮喘加重发作后,仅需治疗13名患者即可预防复发并避免接受额外治疗。
在对急性哮喘加重发作进行评估后使用短疗程糖皮质激素可显著减少复发并避免接受额外治疗的次数,减少β - 激动剂的使用,且副作用没有明显增加。肌肉注射糖皮质激素似乎与口服药物效果相同。