Suppr超能文献

多奈哌齐用于治疗轻度和中度阿尔茨海默病。

Donepezil for mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Birks J S, Melzer D

机构信息

Department of Geratology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001190.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and is a primary degenerative disease of the brain of unknown cause. Onset is usually late in life with increasing impairment of memory, developing gradually into a global impairment of cognition, orientation, linguistic ability and judgement. The clinical course is accompanied by growing disability and dependency on care. One of the characteristic features of the disease is the widely variable rate of progression seen in different patients. Acetylcholine is an important neurotransmitter associated with memory, and abnormalities in cholinergic neurones (including cell loss) are among the many neurological and neurochemical abnormalities that develop in AD. One approach to lessening the impact of these abnormalities is to inhibit the breakdown of acetylcholine by blocking the relevant enzyme. Tacrine was the first compound approved as a treatment for AD in the US and worked in this way, but caused severe side effects. E2020 (donepezil, Aricept) is a second generation cholinesterase inhibitor and appears to be highly specific, with relatively few side effects.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess whether or not donepezil improves the well-being of patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials, was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'ARICEPT'. Medline, PsychLIT and EMBASE electronic databases were searched with the above terms. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, double-blind, randomised controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was administered for more than a day and compared with placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by the reviewers (JSB & DB), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted or standardised mean differences or Peto odds ratios (95%CI) estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used.

MAIN RESULTS

There are 4 included trials, covering treatment of 12 or 24 weeks duration in highly selected patients. The only information available on one trial (Gauthier 1998) is a conference abstract which reports no usable results. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function and global clinical state, but data on several important dimensions of outcome are not available. The results of three trials suggest a small beneficial effect of donepezil in improving cognitive function: at a 5mg/day dose, improvements measured -2.6 points (95%CI -3.5 -- -1.8) on weighted mean difference, in the midrange of the 70 point ADAS-Cog scale. The results of two trials show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by an independent clinician) in those treated with donepezil compared to placebo. The patient's own rating of their Quality of Life showed no benefit of donepezil compared with placebo. There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10mg/d (but not the 5mg/d) donepezil group compared with placebo, which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10mg/d in progressively declining characteristics, as last available measures were used in analyses. A variety of adverse effects were recorded, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12 or 24 weeks, donepezil produced modest improvements in cognitive function and study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients. No improvements were present on patient self-assessed quality of life and data on many important outcomes are not available. The practical importance of these changes to patients and carers is unclear.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病是痴呆最常见的病因,是一种病因不明的原发性脑部退行性疾病。发病通常在生命晚期,记忆力逐渐受损,逐渐发展为认知、定向、语言能力和判断力的全面损害。临床病程伴随着残疾的增加和对护理的依赖。该疾病的一个特征是不同患者的病情进展速度差异很大。乙酰胆碱是一种与记忆相关的重要神经递质,胆碱能神经元的异常(包括细胞丢失)是阿尔茨海默病中出现的众多神经学和神经化学异常之一。减轻这些异常影响的一种方法是通过阻断相关酶来抑制乙酰胆碱的分解。他克林是美国首个被批准用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的化合物,其作用方式就是如此,但会引起严重的副作用。E2020(多奈哌齐,安理申)是第二代胆碱酯酶抑制剂,似乎具有高度特异性,副作用相对较少。

目的

本综述的目的是评估多奈哌齐是否能改善轻度或中度阿尔茨海默病患者的健康状况。

检索策略

使用“多奈哌齐”“E2020”和“安理申”等检索词,检索Cochrane痴呆与认知障碍临床对照试验注册库。使用上述检索词检索Medline、PsychLIT和EMBASE电子数据库。联系了多奈哌齐研究组的成员和卫材公司。

入选标准

所有无混杂因素、双盲、随机对照试验,其中多奈哌齐治疗时间超过一天,并与阿尔茨海默病患者的安慰剂进行比较。

数据收集与分析

数据由评审员(JSB和DB)独立提取,在适当且可能的情况下进行合并,并估计加权或标准化平均差或Peto比值比(95%可信区间)。尽可能使用意向性分析数据。

主要结果

纳入4项试验,涵盖对高度选择的患者进行12周或24周的治疗。一项试验(Gauthier 1998)唯一可用的信息是一篇会议摘要,该摘要未报告可用结果。可用的结局数据涵盖认知功能和整体临床状态等领域,但结局的几个重要维度的数据不可用。三项试验的结果表明,多奈哌齐在改善认知功能方面有轻微益处:在5毫克/天的剂量下,加权平均差测量的改善为-2.6分(95%可信区间-3.5至-1.8),处于70分的阿尔茨海默病评估量表的中间范围。两项试验的结果显示,与安慰剂相比,接受多奈哌齐治疗的患者在整体临床状态(由独立临床医生评估)方面有一些改善。患者对其生活质量的自我评分显示,与安慰剂相比,多奈哌齐没有益处。与安慰剂相比,10毫克/天(但不是5毫克/天)多奈哌齐组在治疗结束前退出的患者明显更多,这可能导致在分析中对10毫克/天有益变化的一些高估,因为在分析中使用的是最后可用的测量值。记录了多种不良反应,但很少有患者因干预直接退出试验。

评审员结论

在对轻度或中度阿尔茨海默病患者进行12周或24周治疗的选定患者中,多奈哌齐在改善认知功能方面有适度改善,研究临床医生对接受治疗患者的整体临床状态评价更积极。患者自我评估的生活质量没有改善,许多重要结局的数据不可用。这些变化对患者和护理人员的实际重要性尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验