Suppr超能文献

多奈哌齐用于治疗血管性认知障碍。

Donepezil for vascular cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Malouf R, Birks J

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Cochrane Airways Group, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK, SW17 ORE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD004395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004395.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular disease is the second commonest cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease. There are difficulties in classifying patients with this type of cognitive impairment owing to varied clinical presentation and different types of arterial disease. There is some degree of overlap in the neuropathology of Alzheimer's and vascular dementia. Deficient cholinergic neurotransmission, a characteristic of Alzheimer's disease, has been postulated to contribute to the cognitive impairment of vascular disease of the brain. Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil, may therefore be a rational treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of donepezil on cognitive function, clinical global impression, activities of daily living and social functioning of people with vascular cognitive impairment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from a search of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Specialized Register on 21 July 2003 using the terms donepezil, E2020 and Aricept. This Register consists of records from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trials databases. Unpublished trials were requested from the drug company Eisai Inc and they provided us with the required data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded randomized double-blind trials comparing donepezil with placebo were eligible for inclusion. Trials using combinations of donepezil with other pharmacological interventions were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both reviewers assessed studies against the criteria for inclusion and extracted data. Data were pooled where appropriate, and weighted mean differences or Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals calculated. Intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken when possible.

MAIN RESULTS

Two large-scale, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled trials were identified for inclusion. A total of 1219 people with mild to moderate cognitive decline due to probable or possible vascular dementia (according to the NINCDS/AIREN criteria and the Hachinski Ischemia Scale) were recruited. Donepezil, at doses of 5 or 10 mg a day was compared with placebo for 24 weeks. For each outcome measure, mean change from baseline at weeks 12 and 24, using a last observation carried forward analysis, was calculated. Cognitive function: The donepezil groups showed statistically significantly better performance than the placebo groups on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog) at 12 and 24 weeks. The donepezil groups produced statistically significantly better scores than the placebo groups on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at 12 and 24 weeks. Global function: The sum of the boxes of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR-SB) showed at 24 weeks a statistically significant benefit of 10 mg donepezil daily over both placebo and a 5 mg daily dosage. The Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-plus version (CIBIC-plus) showed improved global function of participants taking 5 mg of donepezil daily compared with the placebo group but this was not seen in the higher dose group. Activities of daily living and social behaviour: On the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) scale, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups taking donepezil 5mg per day donepezil and placebo, but the group taking 10 mg of donepezil a day showed benefit compared with placebo There were statistically significant benefit for donepezil at either dosage compared with placebo on the Alzheimer's Disease Functional Assessment and Change Scale (ADFACS). Tolerability and adverse effects: Broad range of adverse events were reported in the studies and data confirmed that donepezil was well tolerated, and most of the side effects were transient and were resolved by stopping the medication. Some of these events, especially nausea, diarrhoea, anorexia and cramp appeared more frequently on the 10 mg dose where there was a statistically significant difference compared with placebo. Drop-out: The drop-out rate was similar between the groups, 84.2% (330) patients completed the studies. The withdrawal rate was low and due mainly to side effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the available studies support the benefit of donepezil in improving cognition function, clinical global impression and activities of daily living in patients with probable or possible mild to moderate vascular cognitive impairment after 6 months treatment. Extending studies for longer periods would be desirable to establish the efficacy of donepezil in patients with advanced stages of cognitive impairment. Moreover, there is an urgent need for establishing specific clinical diagnostic criteria and rating scales for vascular cognitive impairment.

摘要

背景

血管性疾病是仅次于阿尔茨海默病的第二常见痴呆病因。由于临床表现多样以及动脉疾病类型不同,对这类认知障碍患者进行分类存在困难。阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆在神经病理学上存在一定程度的重叠。胆碱能神经传递不足是阿尔茨海默病的一个特征,据推测它会导致脑血管性疾病的认知障碍。因此,胆碱酯酶抑制剂,如多奈哌齐,可能是一种合理的治疗药物。

目的

评估多奈哌齐对血管性认知障碍患者认知功能、临床总体印象、日常生活活动能力和社会功能的临床疗效及耐受性。

检索策略

2003年7月21日,通过检索Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库,使用多奈哌齐、E2020和安理申等检索词,识别相关随机对照试验。该注册库包含所有主要医疗保健数据库和许多正在进行的试验数据库的记录。向卫材株式会社索要未发表的试验资料,他们为我们提供了所需数据。

入选标准

所有比较多奈哌齐与安慰剂的无混杂因素的随机双盲试验均符合纳入标准。排除使用多奈哌齐与其他药物干预联合治疗的试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者根据纳入标准评估研究并提取数据。在适当情况下合并数据,并计算加权平均差或Peto比值比及95%置信区间。尽可能进行意向性分析。

主要结果

确定两项大规模、随机、双盲、平行组对照试验纳入研究。共招募了1219例因可能或疑似血管性痴呆导致轻度至中度认知功能下降的患者(根据美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所/瑞士神经科学会标准及哈金斯基缺血量表)。将每日剂量为5或10毫克的多奈哌齐与安慰剂进行24周的比较。对于每个结局指标,采用末次观察结转分析计算第12周和24周相对于基线的平均变化。认知功能:在第12周和24周时,多奈哌齐组在阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)上的表现比安慰剂组在统计学上有显著更好的改善。在第 weeks 12和24周时,多奈哌齐组在简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)上的得分比安慰剂组在统计学上有显著更好的表现。总体功能:临床痴呆评定量表总分(CDR-SB)显示,在第24周时,每日10毫克多奈哌齐组相对于安慰剂组和每日5毫克剂量组在统计学上有显著益处。基于临床医生访谈的变化印象加版(CIBIC-plus)显示,每日服用5毫克多奈哌齐的参与者与安慰剂组相比总体功能有所改善,但在高剂量组中未观察到。日常生活活动和社会行为:在日常生活能力量表(IADL)上,每日服用5毫克多奈哌齐组与安慰剂组之间无统计学显著差异,但每日服用10毫克多奈哌齐组与安慰剂组相比有获益。在阿尔茨海默病功能评估与变化量表(ADFACS)上,与安慰剂相比,两种剂量的多奈哌齐均有统计学显著益处。耐受性和不良反应:研究报告了广泛的不良事件,数据证实多奈哌齐耐受性良好,大多数副作用是短暂的,停药后可缓解。其中一些事件,尤其是恶心、腹泻、厌食和痉挛,在10毫克剂量组中出现频率更高,与安慰剂组相比有统计学显著差异。退出:两组的退出率相似,84.2%(330例)患者完成了研究。退出率较低,主要是由于副作用。

综述作者结论

现有研究证据支持多奈哌齐在治疗6个月后对可能或疑似轻度至中度血管性认知障碍患者改善认知功能、临床总体印象和日常生活活动能力有益。需要进行更长时间的研究以确定多奈哌齐在认知障碍晚期患者中的疗效。此外,迫切需要建立血管性认知障碍的特定临床诊断标准和评定量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验