Hamer H M, Wyllie E, Stanford L, Mascha E, Kotagal P, Wolgamuth B
Department of Neurology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Epilepsia. 2000 May;41(5):554-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00209.x.
Identification of risk factors for unsuccessful testing during intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in preadolescent children.
A pediatric IAP protocol was attempted in 42 candidates for epilepsy surgery (5-12 years old; mean, 10 years) based on the ability to pass a practice test. Language dominance was defined by marked asymmetry until first verbal response and paraphasic errors. Intact hemispheric memory was defined by recall of >/=60% of test items. The odds ratios of baseline variables (age at IAP, Full-Scale IQ, side of disease, age at seizure onset, amobarbital dose) were calculated for various IAP outcomes.
IAPs were accomplished in 40 children. Language dominance was established in 25 (62.5%) of 40 patients: all 21 focal resection candidates were left language dominant; four hemispherectomy candidates had intact language after injection of the damaged hemisphere. In 12 (30%) of 40 patients, language testing failed because of agitation or obtundation. Compared with the 21 children with language dominance established by bilateral IAP, these 12 children had lower mean Full-Scale IQ (66.4 vs. 87.9; p = 0.014), and more frequently, the epileptogenic lesion in the left hemisphere (presumed dominant by right-handedness; 78 vs. 33%; p = 0.04). Excluding hemispherectomy candidates (intentionally only one injection), memory testing could not be completed in 13 (36%) of 36 children because of obtundation or agitation. These children were significantly younger than the 23 (64%) of 36 with successful bilateral memory testing (mean age, 107.6 vs. 128.7 months; p = 0. 006). The eight (25%) of 32 children with failing retention scores after ipsilateral injection had lower Full-Scale IQ than did the 24 (75%) patients who passed (mean, 59.6 vs. 81.7 months; p = 0.03).
The IAP successfully established hemispheric language dominance and memory representation for just under two thirds of the preselected preadolescent children. Risk factors for unsuccessful testing included low Full-Scale IQ (especially <80), young age (especially <10 years), and seizures arising from the left hemisphere presumed dominant by right-handedness.
确定青春期前儿童颈内动脉异戊巴比妥试验(IAP)期间测试未成功的危险因素。
基于通过练习测试的能力,对42名癫痫手术候选患儿(5 - 12岁;平均10岁)尝试采用儿科IAP方案。语言优势通过首次言语反应和错语错误出现前的明显不对称来定义。完整的半球记忆通过回忆≥60%的测试项目来定义。计算各种IAP结果的基线变量(IAP时的年龄、全量表智商、病变侧、癫痫发作起始年龄、异戊巴比妥剂量)的比值比。
40名儿童完成了IAP。40例患者中有25例(62.5%)确定了语言优势:21例局灶性切除候选者均为左侧语言优势;4例半球切除术候选者在注射受损半球后语言功能完整。40例患者中有12例(30%)因躁动或意识迟钝导致语言测试失败。与通过双侧IAP确定语言优势的21名儿童相比,这12名儿童的平均全量表智商较低(66.4对87.9;p = 0.014),并且更常见的是,癫痫病灶位于左侧半球(根据右利手推测为优势半球;78%对33%;p = 0.04)。排除半球切除术候选者(仅故意注射一次),36名儿童中有13名(36%)因意识迟钝或躁动而无法完成记忆测试。这些儿童明显比36名双侧记忆测试成功的儿童(64%)年轻(平均年龄,107.6对128.7个月;p = 0.006)。32名儿童中,同侧注射后记忆保留分数未通过的8名(25%)儿童的全量表智商低于通过测试的24名(75%)患者(平均,59.6对81.7个月;p = 0.03)。
IAP成功地为略少于三分之二的预先选定的青春期前儿童建立了半球语言优势和记忆表征。测试未成功的危险因素包括全量表智商低(尤其是<80)、年龄小(尤其是<10岁)以及起源于根据右利手推测为优势半球的左侧半球的癫痫发作。