Epkins C C
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2051, USA.
J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Jun;29(2):199-208. doi: 10.1207/S15374424jccp2902_6.
Examined whether cognitive features in Beck's (1967) model of depression and his cognitive content-specificity hypothesis (Beck, Brown, Steer, Eidelson, & Riskind, 1987) are broadband specific features that distinguish internalizing problems from externalizing problems. From a community (n = 389; 196 boys, 193 girls; age M = 9.98, SD = 1.52) and clinic (n = 82; 55 boys, 27 girls; age M = 10.42, SD = 2.91) sample, 4 groups were defined on behavioral measures and then examined on cognitive measures: externalizing only (n = 33), internalizing only (n = 41), comorbid externalizing and internalizing (n = 53), and control (neither externalizing nor internalizing; n = 35). Both the internalizing only and comorbid groups reported significantly more cognitive disturbances (negative cognitive triad, cognitive processing distortions, and "depressive" and "anxious" thought content) than both of the externalizing only and control groups in both the community and clinic samples. The results were not related to either overall level of psychopathology (as reported by mothers) or social desirability in children's reporting. These findings suggest that the cognitive features in Beck's model distinguish internalizing from externalizing problems and add to a growing literature that calls for further conceptual refinement of cognitive models for understanding both narrow-band and broadband syndromes.
考察了贝克(1967年)抑郁症模型中的认知特征及其认知内容特异性假说(贝克、布朗、斯迪尔、艾德尔森和里斯金德,1987年)是否为区分内化问题和外化问题的广泛特异性特征。从一个社区样本(n = 389;196名男孩,193名女孩;年龄M = 9.98,标准差 = 1.52)和一个临床样本(n = 82;55名男孩,27名女孩;年龄M = 10.42,标准差 = 2.91)中,根据行为测量定义了4组,然后对其进行认知测量:仅外化问题组(n = 33)、仅内化问题组(n = 41)、共病外化和内化问题组(n = 53)以及对照组(既无外化问题也无内化问题;n = 35)。在社区和临床样本中,仅内化问题组和共病组报告的认知干扰(消极认知三联征、认知加工扭曲以及“抑郁”和“焦虑”思维内容)均显著多于仅外化问题组和对照组。结果与心理病理学的总体水平(如母亲报告的)或儿童报告中的社会期望性均无关。这些发现表明,贝克模型中的认知特征可区分内化问题和外化问题,并为越来越多呼吁进一步完善认知模型以理解窄带和宽带综合征的文献增添了内容。