Bowden C L, Calabrese J R, McElroy S L, Gyulai L, Wassef A, Petty F, Pope H G, Chou J C, Keck P E, Rhodes L J, Swann A C, Hirschfeld R M, Wozniak P J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 78284-7792, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 May;57(5):481-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.481.
Long-term outcomes are often poor in patients with bipolar disorder despite treatment; more effective treatments are needed to reduce recurrences and morbidity. This study compared the efficacy of divalproex, lithium, and placebo as prophylactic therapy.
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter study of treatment outcomes was conducted over a 52-week maintenance period. Patients who met the recovery criteria within 3 months of the onset of an index manic episode (n = 372) were randomized to maintenance treatment with divalproex, lithium, or placebo in a 2:1:1 ratio. Psychotropic medications were discontinued before randomization, except for open-label divalproex or lithium, which were gradually tapered over the first 2 weeks of maintenance treatment. The primary outcome measure was time to recurrence of any mood episode. Secondary measures were time to a manic episode, time to a depressive episode, average change from baseline in Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Change Version subscale scores for depression and mania, and Global Assessment of Function scores.
The divalproex group did not differ significantly from the placebo group in time to any mood episode. Divalproex was superior to placebo in terms of lower rates of discontinuation for either a recurrent mood episode or depressive episode. Divalproex was superior to lithium in longer duration of successful prophylaxis in the study and less deterioration in depressive symptoms and Global Assessment Scale scores.
The treatments did not differ significantly on time to recurrence of any mood episode during maintenance therapy. Patients treated with divalproex had better outcomes than those treated with placebo or lithium on several secondary outcome measures.
尽管接受了治疗,但双相情感障碍患者的长期预后往往较差;需要更有效的治疗方法来减少复发和发病率。本研究比较了丙戊酸二钠、锂盐和安慰剂作为预防性治疗的疗效。
在为期52周的维持期内进行了一项随机、双盲、平行组多中心治疗结果研究。在首次躁狂发作起病3个月内符合康复标准的患者(n = 372),以2:1:1的比例随机分配接受丙戊酸二钠、锂盐或安慰剂维持治疗。在随机分组前停用精神药物,但开放标签的丙戊酸二钠或锂盐除外,它们在维持治疗的前2周逐渐减量。主要结局指标是任何情绪发作复发的时间。次要指标包括躁狂发作时间、抑郁发作时间、情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-变化版抑郁和躁狂分量表得分相对于基线的平均变化以及功能总体评估得分。
丙戊酸二钠组在任何情绪发作时间上与安慰剂组无显著差异。在因复发性情绪发作或抑郁发作而停药的发生率方面,丙戊酸二钠优于安慰剂。在本研究中,丙戊酸二钠在成功预防的持续时间上优于锂盐,且抑郁症状和总体评估量表得分的恶化程度较小。
在维持治疗期间,各治疗组在任何情绪发作复发时间上无显著差异。在几个次要结局指标上,接受丙戊酸二钠治疗的患者比接受安慰剂或锂盐治疗的患者结局更好。