Bowden Charles L, Collins Michelle A, McElroy Susan L, Calabrese Joseph R, Swann Alan C, Weisler Richard H, Wozniak Patricia J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Oct;30(10):1932-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300788.
Euphoric and mixed (dysphoric) manic symptoms have different response patterns to divalproex and lithium in acute mania treatment, but have not been studied in relationship to maintenance treatment outcomes. We examined the impact of initial euphoric or dysphoric manic symptomatology on maintenance outcome. Randomized maintenance treatment with divalproex, lithium, or placebo was provided for 372 bipolar I patients, who met improvement criteria during open phase treatment for an index manic episode. The current analysis grouped patients according to the index manic episode subtype (euphoric or dysphoric), and evaluated the impact on maintenance treatment outcome. The rate of early discontinuation due to intolerance during maintenance treatment was higher for initially dysphoric patients (N=249) than euphoric patients (N=123; 15.7 vs 7.3%, respectively; p=0.032). Both lithium (23.2%) and divalproex (17.1%) were associated with more premature discontinuations due to intolerance than placebo (4.8%; p=0.003 and 0.02, respectively) in the initially dysphoric patients. Among initially euphoric patients, treatment with lithium was associated with significantly more premature discontinuations due to intolerance compared to placebo (18.2 vs 0%; p=0.03), and divalproex was significantly (p=0.05) more effective than lithium, but not placebo in delaying time to a depressive episode. Initial euphoric mania appeared to predispose to better outcomes on indices of depression and overall function with divalproex maintenance than with either placebo or lithium. Dysphoric mania appeared to predispose patients to more side effects when treated with either divalproex or lithium during maintenance therapy.
在急性躁狂症治疗中,欣快性和混合性(烦躁性)躁狂症状对丙戊酸镁和锂有不同的反应模式,但尚未针对维持治疗结果进行研究。我们研究了初始欣快或烦躁性躁狂症状对维持治疗结果的影响。对372例双相I型障碍患者提供了丙戊酸镁、锂或安慰剂的随机维持治疗,这些患者在首次躁狂发作的开放期治疗期间达到了改善标准。当前分析根据首次躁狂发作亚型(欣快性或烦躁性)对患者进行分组,并评估对维持治疗结果的影响。在维持治疗期间,最初表现为烦躁性的患者(N = 249)因不耐受导致的早期停药率高于欣快性患者(N = 123;分别为15.7%和7.3%;p = 0.032)。在最初表现为烦躁性的患者中,锂(23.2%)和丙戊酸镁(17.1%)因不耐受导致的过早停药均比安慰剂(4.8%)更多(分别为p = 0.003和0.02)。在最初表现为欣快性的患者中,与安慰剂相比,锂治疗因不耐受导致的过早停药显著更多(18.2%对0%;p = 0.03),并且丙戊酸镁在延迟抑郁发作时间方面比锂显著更有效(p = 0.05),但不比安慰剂更有效。与安慰剂或锂相比,初始欣快性躁狂在接受丙戊酸镁维持治疗时,在抑郁指标和整体功能方面似乎更容易获得更好的结果。在维持治疗期间,当使用丙戊酸镁或锂治疗时,烦躁性躁狂似乎使患者更容易出现更多副作用。