Golin C E, Wenger N S, Liu H, Dawson N V, Teno J M, Desbiens N A, Lynn J, Oye R K, Phillips R S
UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90095-1736, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S52-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03141.x.
To evaluate prospectively seriously ill patients' characteristics, perceptions, and preferences associated with discussing resuscitation (CPR) with their physicians.
Prospective cohort.
Five academic medical centers.
Patients enrolled in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments who had not communicated with their physicians about CPR at admission to a hospital for life-threatening illness (n = 1288).
Baseline surveys of patients' characteristics, health status, desires for participation in medical decision making, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Two month follow-up surveys of patients' communication of resuscitation preference. Chart reviews for clinical indicators.
Thirty percent of patients communicated their resuscitation preference to their physician during a 2 month-period following hospital admission. Patients whose preference was to forego CPR (odds ratio (OR) 2.9;(95% CI, 1.9-4.2)) and whose preference had changed from desiring to foregoing CPR (OR 1.6; (95% CI, 1.1-2.4)) were more likely to communicate their preference than patients who continued to prefer to receive CPR. However, only 50% of patients who maintained a preference to forego CPR communicated this over a 2-month period. Having an advance directive and remaining in the hospital at 2-month follow-up were also independently associated with communication, whereas patients' preference for participation in decision-making, health status, and prognostic estimate were not.
Communication about resuscitation preferences occurred infrequently after hospital admission for a serious illness, even among patients wishing to forego resuscitation. Factors such as declining quality of life, which were expected to be associated with communication, were not. An invitation to communicate about CPR preference is important after hospital admission for a serious illness. Novel approaches are needed to promote physician-patient discussions about resuscitation.
前瞻性评估重症患者与医生讨论心肺复苏(CPR)相关的特征、看法及偏好。
前瞻性队列研究。
五家学术医疗中心。
参与“了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究”的患者,这些患者在因危及生命的疾病入院时未与医生就CPR进行沟通(n = 1288)。
对患者特征、健康状况、参与医疗决策的意愿以及心肺复苏情况进行基线调查。对患者复苏偏好的沟通情况进行为期两个月的随访调查。查阅病历获取临床指标。
30%的患者在入院后两个月内将其复苏偏好告知了医生。与继续希望接受CPR的患者相比,那些偏好放弃CPR的患者(优势比(OR)2.9;(95%置信区间,1.9 - 4.2))以及偏好从希望接受CPR转变为放弃CPR的患者(OR 1.6;(95%置信区间,1.1 - 2.4))更有可能告知其偏好。然而,在为期两个月的时间里,只有50%坚持偏好放弃CPR的患者传达了这一意愿。拥有预先指示以及在两个月随访时仍住院也与沟通独立相关,而患者参与决策的偏好、健康状况和预后估计则不然。
重病入院后,关于复苏偏好的沟通很少发生,即使在希望放弃复苏的患者中也是如此。预期与沟通相关的因素,如生活质量下降,实际并非如此。重病入院后,邀请患者沟通CPR偏好很重要。需要新的方法来促进医患之间关于复苏的讨论。