Nyiendo J, Haas M, Goodwin P
Research Division, Western States Chiropractic College, Portland, OR 97230, USA.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):239-45.
Chronic low-back pain is a significant public health problem for which few therapies are supported by predictable outcomes. In this report, practice activities and 1-month outcomes data are presented for 93 chiropractic patients and 45 medical patients with chronic, recurrent low-back pain.
A prospective, observational, community-based feasibility study involving chiropractors and family medicine physicians.
Forty private chiropractic clinics, the outpatient clinic of the Department of Family Medicine at Oregon Health Sciences University, and 5 other Portland area family medicine clinics.
The main outcome measures were pain severity, functional disability, sensory and affective pain quality at 1 month, and patient satisfaction assessed at 7 to 10 days and at 1 month.
Although differences were noted in age, sex, education, and employment, the patients were closely matched at baseline with respect to frequency, severity, and type of low-back pain and the psychosocial dimensions of general health. The treatment of choice for chiropractors was spinal manipulation and physical therapy modalities; for medical physicians antiinflammatory agents were most frequently used. Chiropractic patients averaged 4 visits, and medical patients averaged 1 visit. On average, chiropractic patients showed improvement across all outcomes: 31% change in pain severity, 29% in functional disability, 36% in sensory pain quality, and 57% in affective pain quality. Medical patients showed minimal improvement in pain severity (6%) and functional disability (1%) and showed deterioration in the sensory (29%) and affective (26%) dimensions of pain quality. Satisfaction scores were higher for chiropractic patients. Outcomes for medical patients were heavily dependent on psychosocial status at baseline.
Patients with chronic low-back pain treated by chiropractors show greater improvement and satisfaction at 1 month than patients treated by family physicians. Nonclinical factors may play an important role in patient progress. Findings from the Health Resources and Services Administration-funded project will include a report on the influence of practice activities, including more frequent visits by chiropractic patients, on the clinical course of low-back pain and patient outcomes. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:239-45).
慢性下腰痛是一个重大的公共卫生问题,很少有疗法能产生可预测的疗效。在本报告中,我们呈现了93例脊椎按摩治疗患者和45例患有慢性复发性下腰痛的内科患者的治疗活动及1个月的疗效数据。
一项涉及脊椎按摩治疗师和家庭医学医生的前瞻性、观察性、基于社区的可行性研究。
40家私人脊椎按摩治疗诊所、俄勒冈健康科学大学家庭医学系门诊以及波特兰地区的其他5家家庭医学诊所。
主要疗效指标包括1个月时的疼痛严重程度、功能障碍、感觉性和情感性疼痛性质,以及在7至10天和1个月时评估的患者满意度。
尽管在年龄、性别、教育程度和就业情况方面存在差异,但患者在基线时的下腰痛频率、严重程度和类型以及总体健康的心理社会维度方面匹配良好。脊椎按摩治疗师的首选治疗方法是脊柱推拿和物理治疗方式;内科医生最常使用抗炎药物。脊椎按摩治疗患者平均就诊4次,内科患者平均就诊1次。平均而言,脊椎按摩治疗患者在所有疗效指标上均有改善:疼痛严重程度改善31%,功能障碍改善29%,感觉性疼痛性质改善36%,情感性疼痛性质改善57%。内科患者在疼痛严重程度(6%)和功能障碍(1%)方面改善甚微,在疼痛性质的感觉维度(29%)和情感维度(26%)方面出现恶化。脊椎按摩治疗患者的满意度得分更高。内科患者的疗效很大程度上取决于基线时的心理社会状态。
与家庭医生治疗的患者相比,脊椎按摩治疗师治疗的慢性下腰痛患者在1个月时改善更大且满意度更高。非临床因素可能在患者病情进展中起重要作用。由卫生资源与服务管理局资助的该项目的研究结果将包括一份关于治疗活动(包括脊椎按摩治疗患者更频繁就诊)对下腰痛临床病程和患者疗效影响的报告。(《手法治疗与生理疗法杂志》2000年;23:239 - 45)