• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗保健专业人员在高血压管理中使用心血管风险表的准确性如何?

How accurately do primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk tables in the management of hypertension?

作者信息

Peters T J, Montgomery A A, Fahey T

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Dec;49(449):987-8.

PMID:10824344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1313585/
Abstract

It has been suggested that use of cardiovascular risk tables in hypertensive patients might improve clinical management. As part of a randomised controlled trial, we evaluated the accuracy of health professionals' use of the New Zealand risk tables in primary care consultations. Chance-corrected agreement between health professionals' assessments of absolute risk was only moderate (weighted kappa = 0.56 at the 12-month follow-up). Inaccurate use of cardiovascular risk tables may be a barrier to effective implementation of research evidence in the management of hypertension.

摘要

有人提出,在高血压患者中使用心血管风险表可能会改善临床管理。作为一项随机对照试验的一部分,我们评估了卫生专业人员在初级保健会诊中使用新西兰风险表的准确性。卫生专业人员对绝对风险的评估之间的机遇校正一致性仅为中等程度(12个月随访时加权kappa = 0.56)。心血管风险表的不准确使用可能是在高血压管理中有效实施研究证据的一个障碍。

相似文献

1
How accurately do primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk tables in the management of hypertension?基层医疗保健专业人员在高血压管理中使用心血管风险表的准确性如何?
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Dec;49(449):987-8.
2
[Hypertension management in general practice in Iceland].[冰岛全科医疗中的高血压管理]
Laeknabladid. 2006 May;92(5):375-80.
3
Challenges for the management of hypertension in low-resource settings.资源匮乏地区高血压管理面临的挑战。
Ethn Dis. 2003 Summer;13(2 Suppl 2):S67-70.
4
The accuracy of ethnicity data in primary care and its impact on cardiovascular risk assessment and management--PREDICT CVD-8.初级保健中种族数据的准确性及其对心血管风险评估和管理的影响——PREDICT CVD-8。
N Z Med J. 2008 Sep 5;121(1281):40-8.
5
Primary care patients' recognition of their own risk for cardiovascular disease: implications for risk communication in practice.基层医疗患者对自身心血管疾病风险的认知:对实际风险沟通的启示
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008 Sep;23(5):471-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32830b35f6.
6
[Initial management of hypertension in a primary care service].[基层医疗服务中高血压的初始管理]
Rev Med Suisse. 2006 Sep 13;2(78):2024-6, 2029-34.
7
Gaps in primary care documentation of cardiovascular risk factors.心血管危险因素初级保健记录中的差距。
N Z Med J. 2008 Feb 15;121(1269):24-33.
8
Integrated electronic decision support increases cardiovascular disease risk assessment four fold in routine primary care practice.在常规基层医疗实践中,集成电子决策支持系统可使心血管疾病风险评估提高四倍。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Apr;15(2):173-8. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f13af4.
9
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: the feasibility and impact of cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in Australian general practice.一项随机对照试验的研究方案:澳大利亚全科医疗中心血管绝对风险评估的可行性和影响
Am Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.11.016.
10
The SaM (Screening and Monitoring) approach to cardiovascular risk-reduction in primary care--cyclic monitoring and individual treatment of patients at cardiovascular risk using the electronic medical record.基层医疗中降低心血管风险的筛查与监测(SaM)方法——利用电子病历对心血管风险患者进行循环监测和个体化治疗。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Feb;12(1):56-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving attendance for cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice: an RCT of a monetary incentive for patients.提高澳大利亚全科医疗中心心血管疾病风险评估的参与率:一项针对患者金钱激励的 RCT 研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 8;13:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-54.
2
Systematic review of implementation strategies for risk tables in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.心血管疾病预防中风险表实施策略的系统评价
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(3):535-45. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s329.
3
Comparison of estimates and calculations of risk of coronary heart disease by doctors and nurses using different calculation tools in general practice: cross sectional study.全科医疗中医生和护士使用不同计算工具对冠心病风险的评估与计算比较:横断面研究
BMJ. 2002 Feb 23;324(7335):459-64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.459.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice.循证临床实践的障碍与桥梁
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):273-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.273.
2
Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.原发性高血压管理指南:英国高血压学会第二工作组报告
BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):983-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6883.983.
3
Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的胆固醇降低的谢菲尔德风险与治疗表。
Lancet. 1995 Dec 2;346(8988):1467-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92477-9.
4
Recommendations from the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference on the Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension.加拿大高血压协会高血压药物治疗共识会议的建议
CMAJ. 1989 May 15;140(10):1141-6.