Suppr超能文献

Water peak suppression: time-frequency vs time-scale approach.

作者信息

Antoine J P, Coron A, Dereppe J M

机构信息

Institut de Physique Théorique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 2 chemin du Cyclotron, Louvain-la-Neuve, B-1348, Belgium.

出版信息

J Magn Reson. 2000 Jun;144(2):189-94. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.2011.

Abstract

Wavelets are the most popular time-scale analysis tool. A well-known application of wavelets in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is water peak extraction/suppression. However, spectroscopists are more familiar with frequency than scale. So, from a spectroscopist point of view, a time-scale analysis tool (i.e., wavelets) is not natural and a time-frequency approach would be much more satisfactory. We explain a time-frequency solution to this problem based on Gabor analysis. As the two formalisms are closely linked together we continuously emphasize their similarities and differences. In particular we show that, here, the Gabor method is as efficient as the wavelet approach, and we give some examples. Those remarks also apply to other NMR problems solved previously with the continuous wavelet transform, such as quantification or dynamical phase correction.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验