Bösing N M, Heise J W, Röher H D
Klinik für Allgemeine und Unfallchirurgie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125(4):341-7.
In view of disappointing results after surgery alone multimodal therapeutic regimes are used to improve long-term prognosis in locally advanced gastric carcinomas. In presence of many reports about encouraging results ("down staging", improved R0-resection rates) but simultaneously missing evidence of efficiency of neoadjuvant therapies in respect to long-term survival (large randomized multicenter trials do not exist until today) and the herewith related uncertainties, we started an inquiry among many surgical units with the intention to evaluate the clinical practice of multimodal treatment for gastric cancer patients in Germany today.
In a questionnaire (3/99) we asked among 97 surgical units (41 university hospitals, 56 big community hospitals) in Germany for the management of gastric cancer patients with special interest to practice and state of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies. Further we analyzed all resected gastric cancer patients (1986-1995) without neoadjuvant treatment in advanced stage of disease (pT3/4NxMx; stage III/IV (UICC'92) in respect to R0-resection rate and long-term prognosis (Kaplan-Meier).
Overall feedback amounted to 78% (76/97) and was higher in university hospitals (90%) than in big community hospitals (70%). Today, neoadjuvant therapies are of more interest than adjuvant therapeutic regimes. But also neoadjuvant therapy is only used in 32% as a rule (in 16% with, in 16% without study conditions). 25% of all surgical units do not employ any neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer until today. In all other surgical units neoadjuvant treatment is performed more individually and sporadically (43%) only in some patients. Neoadjuvant therapies are practiced by haematooncologists in 50%, gastroenterologists in 32% and surgeons in 27%. The predominant neoadjuvant therapeutic strategy is chemotherapy alone (84%). Many surgical units in Germany are interested to participate in a multicenter trial with more interest in neoadjuvant than adjuvant therapy. 185 of 309 resected gastric cancer patients (60%) were classified as stage IIIa, stage IIIb or stage IV patients. R0-resection rate of these advanced gastric cancer patients amounted to 37%; only 24% of them survived 5 years or more.
Considering the missing evidence that multimodal therapies are able to prolong long-term survival in advanced gastric cancer patients, its use without study conditions is questionable. Conclusions, taken from data of clinical trials regarding carcinomas of the esophagus and esophagealgastric junction, are inconsistent in respect to long-term prognosis and results are not transferable to gastric carcinomas. A prospective randomized multicenter trial in advanced gastric cancer patients is of great importance. Following our data, in Germany a high readiness to participate in the forthcoming EORTC-study is present.
鉴于单纯手术治疗效果不尽人意,多模式治疗方案被用于改善局部晚期胃癌的长期预后。尽管有许多关于令人鼓舞的结果(“降期”、提高R0切除率)的报道,但同时缺乏新辅助治疗对长期生存有效性的证据(至今尚无大型随机多中心试验)以及由此产生的相关不确定性,我们对许多外科单位进行了调查,旨在评估当今德国胃癌患者多模式治疗的临床实践。
我们通过一份调查问卷(1999年3月),向德国97个外科单位(41所大学医院、56所大型社区医院)询问了胃癌患者的治疗管理情况,特别关注辅助和新辅助治疗策略的实践及现状。此外,我们分析了所有在疾病晚期(pT3/4NxMx;国际抗癌联盟1992年分期标准的III/IV期)未接受新辅助治疗的胃癌切除患者的R0切除率和长期预后(Kaplan-Meier法)。
总体反馈率为78%(76/97),大学医院的反馈率(90%)高于大型社区医院(70%)。如今,新辅助治疗比辅助治疗更受关注。但新辅助治疗通常仅在32%的情况下使用(16%伴有、16%不伴有研究条件)。直到如今,25%的外科单位在局部晚期胃癌中未采用任何新辅助治疗。在所有其他外科单位,新辅助治疗更多是个体化且零星地进行(43%),仅针对部分患者。新辅助治疗由血液肿瘤学家实施的占50%,胃肠病学家占32%,外科医生占27%。主要的新辅助治疗策略是单纯化疗(84%)。德国许多外科单位有兴趣参与一项多中心试验,对新辅助治疗的兴趣高于辅助治疗。309例胃癌切除患者中有185例(60%)被归类为IIIa期、IIIb期或IV期患者。这些晚期胃癌患者的R0切除率为37%;其中只有24%存活5年或更久。
鉴于缺乏多模式治疗能够延长晚期胃癌患者长期生存的证据,在无研究条件下使用该方法值得怀疑。从食管癌和食管胃交界癌的临床试验数据得出的结论,在长期预后方面并不一致,且结果不能直接应用于胃癌。针对晚期胃癌患者开展一项前瞻性随机多中心试验至关重要。根据我们的数据,德国对即将开展的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的研究表现出很高的参与意愿。