Leek M R, Dubno J R, He N, Ahlstrom J B
Army Audiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. doi: 10.1121/1.428653.
The report in 1993 by Green [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2096-2105 (1993)] describing the application of a new psychophysical method requiring few trials and little time to measure auditory thresholds has generated considerable interest among experimentalists. The procedure uses a single-interval stimulus presentation, requests a yes-no decision by subjects, and implements a maximum-likelihood calculation to determine the next trial stimulus level within an adaptive track, as well as the final threshold estimate. Data are presented here describing separate experiences with this procedure in two laboratories in both detection and discrimination tasks. Issues addressed include comparisons with more traditional psychophysical methods, variability in threshold estimates, experimental time required, and possible minor modifications to improve the basic procedure. Results using this procedure are comparable in terms of variability of estimates to those emerging from more lengthy procedures. However, because it may be difficult for some listeners to maintain a consistent criterion and because attentional lapses may be costly, experimenters must be willing to monitor performance closely and repeat some tracks in cases where excessively high variability is noted. Further, this procedure may not be suitable for tasks for which the form of the psychometric function is not well-established. Modifications allowing a variable slope parameter in the maximum-likelihood evaluations of psychometric functions may be of benefit.
格林于1993年发表的报告[《美国声学学会杂志》93, 2096 - 2105 (1993)]描述了一种新的心理物理学方法的应用,该方法所需试验次数少、时间短,用于测量听觉阈值,这引起了实验人员的极大兴趣。该程序采用单间隔刺激呈现方式,要求受试者做出是或否的判断,并在自适应轨迹内进行最大似然计算,以确定下一次试验的刺激水平以及最终的阈值估计。本文给出了在两个实验室分别使用该程序进行检测和辨别任务的经验数据。讨论的问题包括与更传统的心理物理学方法的比较、阈值估计的变异性、所需的实验时间以及对基本程序可能的微小修改。使用该程序得到的估计变异性结果与更长时间程序得到的结果相当。然而,由于一些听众可能难以保持一致的标准,且注意力不集中可能代价高昂,实验人员必须愿意密切监测表现,并在发现变异性过高的情况下重复一些轨迹。此外,该程序可能不适用于心理测量函数形式尚未明确的任务。在心理测量函数的最大似然评估中允许可变斜率参数的修改可能会有帮助。