Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.
作者信息
Ryan M, Farrar S
机构信息
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD.
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.
BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530.
2
Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Oct;5(4):214-8. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500405.
3
The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Feb;24(1):64-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00725.x.
4
The Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS) publishes its 'Inpatient Patient Experience Survey 2014' report.
J Perioper Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1-2):7-8.
5
Data briefing. A chorus of approvals.
Health Serv J. 2007 Jun 28;117(6062):21.
6
Vascular patients' preferences for local treatment: an application of conjoint analysis.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Jul;6(3):151-7. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927404.
7
"Challenges to neurosurgical service delivery".
Br J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;21(2):187-9. doi: 10.1080/02688690701317185.
8
Valuing Preferences for the Process and Outcomes of Clinical Genetics Services: A Pilot Study.
Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):135-47. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0133-0.
9
Localism can provide the solution to long waiting lists.
Health Serv J. 2014 Aug 1;124(6409):16-7.
10
Health care quality in NHS hospitals.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(1):15-28. doi: 10.1108/09526869610109125.
引用本文的文献
1
Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals' Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration.
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Jul 9;25(3):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8997. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Towards Context-Specific EHDI Services: Understanding Caregivers' Priorities and Preferences in South Africa Through a Conjoint Analysis.
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 May;51(3):e70090. doi: 10.1111/cch.70090.
3
What influences emergency general surgeons' treatment preferences for patients requiring nutritional support? A discrete choice experiment.
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr;27(4):e70081. doi: 10.1111/codi.70081.
4
Balancing choice and socioeconomic realities: analyzing behavioral and economic factors in social oocyte cryopreservation decisions.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 20;15:1467213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1467213. eCollection 2024.
5
Identifying attributes of effective cigar warnings: a choice-based conjoint experiment in an online survey of US adults who smoke cigars.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e088525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088525.
6
Understanding decision making for the use of atraumatic restorative approach based on non-clinical factors by Indian pedodontists - a conjoint analysis.
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 21;13:1401. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157561.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Preferences of Cancer Survivors for Follow-Up Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00722-6. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
8
Gender differences in preferences for mental health apps in the general population - a choice-based conjoint analysis from Germany.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06134-y.
9
Patient preferences for intervention in the setting of precursor multiple myeloma.
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):175. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01161-0.
10
High-dose chemotherapy for patients with stage III breast cancer with homologous recombination deficiency: a discrete choice experiment among healthcare providers.
Acta Oncol. 2024 Sep 10;63:701-709. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40276.
本文引用的文献
1
Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: an application to the patient health card.
Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):117-129. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00024.x.
2
Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care: the case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight.
J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):202-10. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.202.
3
Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments.
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(1):63-75. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00268-3.
4
The NHS in Dumfries and Galloway: straining but optimistic.
BMJ. 1999 Oct 23;319(7217):1123-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7217.1123.
5
Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):340-51.
6
The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.720.
7
Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling.
Health Econ. 1999 Mar;8(2):103-16. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199903)8:2<103::aid-hec393>3.0.co;2-e.
8
Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship.
J Health Econ. 1998 Oct;17(5):587-605. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00035-0.
9
Establishing patient preferences for blood transfusion support: an application of conjoint analysis.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Apr;3(2):70-6. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300203.
10
Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.
Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):11-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.11.
Zotero 插件