Sustić A, Krstulović B, Zupan Z, Dirlić A, Lustica I
Zavod za anesteziologiju i intenzivno lijecenje KBC-a Rijeka.
Lijec Vjesn. 1999 Nov-Dec;121(11-12):366-70.
In the last few years numerous reports from intensive care units confirm that a nonsurgical percutaneous tracheostomy has successfully replaced elective conventional (surgical) tracheostomy. The majority of authors point out the advantages over surgical technique such as: the speed of procedure, the possibility of doing it at bedside thus excluding transport and the need for operating theatre, less infections around stoma, minor cosmetic defects and finally, more economical price. The article describes three, according to pertinent literature most often utilized techniques, i.e. percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy with dilators, percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy with forceps, and translaryngeal tracheostomy. Main differences, advantages and defects of each method are presented. Contraindications and eventual complications are discussed, as well as the utility of supporting methods for safer placement of tracheostomy tubes, such as endoscopy and ultrasonography.
在过去几年中,重症监护病房的大量报告证实,非手术经皮气管切开术已成功取代了选择性传统(外科)气管切开术。大多数作者指出了该方法相对于外科技术的优势,例如:操作速度快、可在床边进行从而无需转运和手术室、造口周围感染较少、美容缺陷较小,最后价格更为经济。本文根据相关文献描述了三种最常用的技术,即使用扩张器的经皮扩张气管切开术、使用钳子的经皮扩张气管切开术和经喉气管切开术。介绍了每种方法的主要区别、优点和缺点。讨论了禁忌症和可能的并发症,以及诸如内窥镜检查和超声检查等有助于更安全放置气管切开管的辅助方法的实用性。