• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗门诊抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍患者的疗效及耐受性

The efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and paroxetine in outpatients with depressive disorder or dysthymia.

作者信息

Ballús C, Quiros G, De Flores T, de la Torre J, Palao D, Rojo L, Gutiérrez M, Casais L, Riesgo Y

机构信息

Hospital Clinico, Barcelona, pain.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Jan;15(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00004850-200015010-00007
PMID:10836286
Abstract

A 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and paroxetine in patients with major depression or dysthymia. Outpatients aged 18-70 years with a baseline score of 17 on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine, 37.5 mg, in the morning and evening or paroxetine, 20 mg, in the morning and placebo in the evening, which could be increased to venlafaxine, 75 mg twice daily, or paroxetine, 20 mg twice daily, after 4 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with the 21-item HAM-D, the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale. Forty-one patients were randomized to venlafaxine and 43 to paroxetine. At week 6, a response was observed in 55% of patients on venlafaxine and 29% on paroxetine (P = 0.03). At week 12, significantly (P = 0.011) more patients in the venlafaxine group had a HAM-D remission score of 8 or less (59% versus 31%). Discontinuation for any reason occurred in 16 (39%) patients on venlafaxine and 11 (26%) on paroxetine. The most common adverse events were nausea (28%), headache (18%) and dry mouth (15%) with venlafaxine and headache (40%) and constipation (16%) with paroxetine. Venlafaxine was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate depression or dysthymia. A consistently higher proportion of patients had a response or remission on venlafaxine than on paroxetine.

摘要

进行了一项为期24周的双盲随机试验,以比较文拉法辛和帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍患者的疗效和耐受性。年龄在18 - 70岁、21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM - D)基线评分17分的门诊患者符合条件。患者被随机分配接受文拉法辛,早晚各37.5mg,或帕罗西汀,早上20mg,晚上服用安慰剂,4周后可将文拉法辛增至每日两次,每次75mg,或帕罗西汀增至每日两次,每次20mg。疗效通过21项HAM - D、蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格评定量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表和临床总体印象量表进行评估。41例患者被随机分配至文拉法辛组,43例至帕罗西汀组。在第6周时,接受文拉法辛治疗的患者中有55%出现反应,接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者中有29%出现反应(P = 0.03)。在第12周时,文拉法辛组HAM - D缓解评分≤8分的患者显著更多(59% 对31%,P = 0.011)。因任何原因停药的情况在接受文拉法辛治疗的16例(39%)患者和接受帕罗西汀治疗的11例(26%)患者中出现。最常见的不良事件是文拉法辛组的恶心(28%)、头痛(18%)和口干(15%),以及帕罗西汀组的头痛(40%)和便秘(16%)。文拉法辛治疗轻至中度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍患者有效且耐受性良好。与帕罗西汀相比,接受文拉法辛治疗的患者出现反应或缓解的比例始终更高。

相似文献

1
The efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine and paroxetine in outpatients with depressive disorder or dysthymia.文拉法辛与帕罗西汀治疗门诊抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍患者的疗效及耐受性
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Jan;15(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200015010-00007.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily venlafaxine extended release (XR) in outpatients with major depression. The Venlafaxine XR 209 Study Group.每日一次的文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者的疗效及耐受性。文拉法辛XR 209研究组
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;58(9):393-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n0904.
3
Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features.米氮平与文拉法辛治疗伴有抑郁特征的住院重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):425-31. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00010.
4
Venlafaxine in treatment-resistant major depression: a Canadian multicenter, open-label trial.文拉法辛治疗难治性重度抑郁症:一项加拿大多中心开放标签试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Oct;19(5):401-6. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199910000-00003.
5
Randomized, double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and sertraline in outpatients with major depressive disorder. Venlafaxine 631 Study Group.文拉法辛与舍曲林治疗重度抑郁症门诊患者的随机双盲对照研究。文拉法辛631研究组。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;61(2):95-100. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0204.
6
Comparisons of the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release venlafaxine, mirtazapine, and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study in a Chinese population.比较文拉法辛缓释剂、米氮平、帕罗西汀治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效和耐受性:一项中国人群双盲、随机、先导研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):357-64. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e7784f.
7
A randomized trial comparing paroxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of bipolar depressed patients taking mood stabilizers.一项比较帕罗西汀和文拉法辛对服用心境稳定剂的双相抑郁患者治疗效果的随机试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;63(6):508-12. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0607.
8
A large open-label study of venlafaxine in depressed outpatients by community-based physicians.一项由社区医生开展的关于文拉法辛治疗门诊抑郁症患者的大型开放标签研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;59(10):515-20. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1004.
9
A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial of venlafaxine hydrochloride in the treatment of major depression.一项关于盐酸文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的随机、安慰剂对照、剂量反应试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;59(3):116-22. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n0305.
10
Lithium augmentation of venlafaxine: an open-label trial.文拉法辛联用锂盐:一项开放标签试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000 Oct;20(5):538-43. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200010000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the Side Effects of Contemporary Antidepressant Drugs: A Comprehensive Review.当代抗抑郁药物的副作用应对:全面综述
Chonnam Med J. 2018 May;54(2):101-112. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2018.54.2.101. Epub 2018 May 25.
2
Paternal dapoxetine administration induced deterioration in reproductive performance, fetal outcome, sexual behavior and biochemistry of male rats.父本给予达泊西汀会导致雄性大鼠的生殖性能、胎儿结局、性行为和生物化学指标恶化。
Int J Impot Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;27(6):206-14. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2015.16. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
3
Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.
新一代抗抑郁药的网状Meta分析与成本效益分析
CNS Drugs. 2015 Aug;29(8):695-712. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0267-6.
4
NMDA receptor/nitrergic system blockage augments antidepressant-like effects of paroxetine in the mouse forced swimming test.NMDA受体/一氧化氮能系统阻断增强了帕罗西汀在小鼠强迫游泳试验中的抗抑郁样作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Oct;206(2):325-33. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1609-1. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
5
Differential effects of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder according to baseline severity.根据基线严重程度,文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的差异效应。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Sep;259(6):329-39. doi: 10.1007/s00406-009-0003-7. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
6
The effect of venlafaxine compared with other antidepressants and placebo in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药及安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):172-85. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0849-0. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
7
Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.第二代抗抑郁药危害的比较风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(10):851-65. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831100-00004.
8
Re-evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine vs SSRI: meta-analysis.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂疗效及耐受性的重新评估:荟萃分析
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Mar;196(4):511-20; discussion 521-2. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0975-9. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
9
Tolerability and safety of fluvoxamine and other antidepressants.氟伏沙明及其他抗抑郁药的耐受性和安全性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;60(4):482-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00865.x.
10
Diagnosis and treatment of dysthymia in children and adolescents.儿童及青少年心境恶劣障碍的诊断与治疗
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(13):927-46. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317130-00001.