Suppr超能文献

改良版0-10 Borg量表在评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘患者呼吸困难程度中的应用价值。

Usefulness of the modified 0-10 Borg scale in assessing the degree of dyspnea in patients with COPD and asthma.

作者信息

Kendrick K R, Baxi S C, Smith R M

机构信息

Emergency Department and Urgent Care Clinic, Veterans Administration San Diego HealthCare System, San Diego, Calif.

出版信息

J Emerg Nurs. 2000 Jun;26(3):216-22. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(00)90093-x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid assessment and monitoring is essential for patients with acute bronchospasm. However, tools for measuring dyspnea or the state of being short of breath are often limited to peak flow, blood gas analysis, and asking patients multiple questions about their breathing at a time when they find speaking difficult. We thus decided to examine a tool called the modified Borg scale (MBS) that had the potential to provide quick, easy, and rapid information about a patient's subjective state of dyspnea. This 0 to 10 rated scale gave our ED patients a device they could use to measure and evaluate their dyspnea. For this reason, we added it to the triage assessment practice and included it in all posttreatment assessment notes on patients with exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were seen in the emergency department and urgent care clinic.

STUDY QUESTIONS

(1) Can patients with acute bronchospastic asthma or COPD adequately communicate their level of dyspnea using the MBS? (2) Does subjective improvement in the patient's dyspnea using the MBS correlate with improvements in pulmonary functions as measured by the peak flow meter and cutaneous oxygen saturation (Sao(2))?

METHODS

Routine and triage assessment of subjective dyspnea using the MBS was instituted at a hospital emergency department serving adult veterans. Concurrently, the MBS was added to our standardized treatment protocol for management of patients with bronchospasm. ED and urgent care records were reviewed to collect baseline and postrespiratory treatment data on peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), MBS scores, and Sao(2) percentages.

RESULTS

Four hundred male veterans aged 24 to 87 years presented with a chief complaint of dyspnea. The assessing physician identified 102 of these patients as having acute bronchospasm; 42 were diagnosed with asthma, and 60 were diagnosed with COPD. All study patients with acute bronchospasm were able to use the MBS to rate their perception of severity of dyspnea. As the peak flow measurements increased, the MBS scores of difficulty breathing decreased. For the asthma groups, the mean MBS score decreased from 5.1 at triage baseline to 2.4 after treatment. This finding indicated that a significant correlation existed between the change in MBS scores and the change in PEFR from pretreatment to posttreatment scores (r = -.31, P <.05). As the peak flow increased, the MBS scores decreased. Sao(2) only slightly improved in the asthma group compared with the COPD group. For patients with COPD, the mean MBS score decreased from 6.0 at triage baseline to 3.0 after treatment. This finding indicated that a significant correlation also existed between the change in MBS scores and the change in PEFR from pretreatment to posttreatment scores (r = -.42, P <.001). Cutaneous oxygen saturation also improved in the COPD group after treatment. The modality of treatment ordered by the physician was metered dose inhaler or nebulizer. These treatment modalities had no effect on the aforementioned results in the asthma or COPD group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBS is a valid and reliable assessment tool for dyspnea. This study demonstrated that it correlated well with other clinical parameters and could be useful when assessing and monitoring outcomes in patients with acute bronchospasm. Patients who used the MBS rated it with a high degree of satisfaction on ease of use and found that the language in this scale adequately expressed their dyspnea. The ED triage and primary care nursing staff rated the MBS as highly satisfactory, stating that it was quick and easy to use. Respiratory assessment in the triage notes and nursing notes were streamlined to consistently include 3 respiratory measures: PEFR, MBS, and Sao(2). Long respiratory narratives were found to be unnecessary in many cases. In addition, the MBS helped to include an important element of subjective assessment when evaluating the severity of dyspnea.

摘要

引言

快速评估和监测对于急性支气管痉挛患者至关重要。然而,用于测量呼吸困难或呼吸急促状态的工具通常仅限于峰值流量、血气分析,以及在患者说话困难时多次询问他们关于呼吸的问题。因此,我们决定研究一种名为改良博格量表(MBS)的工具,它有可能提供关于患者主观呼吸困难状态的快速、简便且迅速的信息。这个从0到10评分的量表为我们急诊科的患者提供了一种可用于测量和评估其呼吸困难的工具。出于这个原因,我们将其添加到分诊评估实践中,并纳入了所有在急诊科和紧急护理诊所就诊的哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重患者的治疗后评估记录中。

研究问题

(1)患有急性支气管痉挛性哮喘或COPD的患者能否使用MBS充分表达其呼吸困难程度?(2)患者使用MBS后主观呼吸困难的改善是否与通过峰值流量计和经皮血氧饱和度(Sao₂)测量的肺功能改善相关?

方法

在一家为成年退伍军人服务的医院急诊科,采用MBS对主观呼吸困难进行常规和分诊评估。同时,MBS被添加到我们用于管理支气管痉挛患者的标准化治疗方案中。回顾急诊科和紧急护理记录,以收集关于呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、MBS评分和Sao₂百分比的基线和呼吸治疗后数据。

结果

400名年龄在24至87岁的男性退伍军人以呼吸困难为主诉前来就诊。评估医生确定其中102名患者患有急性支气管痉挛;42名被诊断为哮喘,60名被诊断为COPD。所有患有急性支气管痉挛的研究患者都能够使用MBS对其呼吸困难严重程度的感知进行评分。随着峰值流量测量值增加,呼吸困难的MBS评分降低。对于哮喘组,分诊基线时的平均MBS评分为5.1,治疗后降至2.4。这一发现表明,MBS评分的变化与从治疗前到治疗后评分的PEFR变化之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.31,P < 0.05)。随着峰值流量增加,MBS评分降低。与COPD组相比,哮喘组的Sao₂仅略有改善。对于COPD患者,分诊基线时的平均MBS评分为6.0,治疗后降至3.0。这一发现表明MBS评分的变化与从治疗前到治疗后评分的PEFR变化之间也存在显著相关性(r = -0.42,P < 0.001)。治疗后COPD组的经皮血氧饱和度也有所改善。医生开出的治疗方式为定量吸入器或雾化器。这些治疗方式对哮喘组或COPD组的上述结果没有影响。

结论

MBS是一种用于评估呼吸困难的有效且可靠的工具。这项研究表明它与其他临床参数相关性良好,在评估和监测急性支气管痉挛患者的预后时可能有用。使用MBS的患者对其易用性给予高度满意评价,并发现该量表中的语言能够充分表达他们的呼吸困难。急诊科分诊和初级护理人员对MBS评价非常满意,称其使用快速简便。分诊记录和护理记录中的呼吸评估被简化,始终包括三项呼吸测量指标:PEFR、MBS和Sao₂。在许多情况下发现冗长的呼吸描述是不必要的。此外,MBS有助于在评估呼吸困难严重程度时纳入主观评估这一重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验