• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[临床治疗研究的基本原则——是什么、如何进行以及为何如此?]

[Basic principles of clinical therapeutic studies--what, how and why?].

作者信息

Unnebrink K, Pritsch M

机构信息

Abteilung Medizinische Biometrie, Universität Heidelberg.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 2000 May;95(1 Spec No):47-53.

PMID:10851848
Abstract

Treatment evaluation is one of the most important tasks in medical research. Detailed standards have been developed during the last decades. The efficacy/effectiveness of treatments can only be assessed in comparison to control groups. To guarantee the internal validity of these comparisons, the groups have to be comparable at the beginning of the study. This can be achieved by randomized allocation of patients to treatment. Furthermore, as far as possible patient and physician should be blinded to treatment in order to avoid subjective influences on treatment results. Groups should still be comparable when analysing the trial, thus an analysis according to the principle of intention-to-treat ("as randomized") should be performed. These indispensable principles for design, conduct and analysis of clinical trials are widely accepted and contribute to reliable and credible results.

摘要

治疗评估是医学研究中最重要的任务之一。在过去几十年里已经制定了详细的标准。治疗的疗效/有效性只能通过与对照组比较来评估。为了保证这些比较的内部有效性,研究开始时各组必须具有可比性。这可以通过将患者随机分配到治疗组来实现。此外,患者和医生应尽可能对治疗不知情,以避免对治疗结果产生主观影响。在分析试验时,各组仍应具有可比性,因此应按照意向性分析原则(“按随机分组情况”)进行分析。这些临床试验设计、实施和分析中不可或缺的原则已被广泛接受,并有助于获得可靠和可信的结果。

相似文献

1
[Basic principles of clinical therapeutic studies--what, how and why?].[临床治疗研究的基本原则——是什么、如何进行以及为何如此?]
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 May;95(1 Spec No):47-53.
2
[Basic principles of clinical trials--what, how, and why?].[临床试验的基本原则——是什么、如何进行以及为何如此?]
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Aug 15;94(8):458-64. doi: 10.1007/BF03044732.
3
[Controlled randomized clinical trials].[对照随机临床试验]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2007 Apr-May;191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8.
4
Overview of studies of treatments for hand eczema-the EDEN hand eczema survey.手部湿疹治疗研究概述——伊登手部湿疹调查
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06040.x.
5
Designing an acupuncture study to meet evidence-based medical criteria: methodological considerations for logistic design and development of treatment interventions arising from the German randomized controlled acupuncture trial on chronic shoulder pain (GRASP).设计一项符合循证医学标准的针灸研究:基于德国慢性肩痛随机对照针灸试验(GRASP)的后勤设计及治疗干预措施开发的方法学考量
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Aug 31;9(8):405-11.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.解读临床试验中的统计学问题。
J Intern Med. 2004 May;255(5):529-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01320.x.
8
Generalizing results of randomized trials to clinical practice: reliability and cautions.将随机试验结果推广至临床实践:可靠性与注意事项
Clin Trials. 2006;3(6):508-12. doi: 10.1177/1740774506073464.
9
What can be learned from open direct comparative trials in multiple sclerosis?从多发性硬化症的开放直接比较试验中可以学到什么?
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;277 Suppl 1:S25-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(09)70008-5.
10
Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.基层医疗中的实用主义对照临床试验:外部效度与内部效度之间的较量
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Dec 22;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-28.