Epstein S K, Nevins M L, Chung J
Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;161(6):1912-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.6.9908068.
Unplanned extubation is a major complication of translaryngeal intubation, but its impact on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and need for ongoing hospital care has not been adequately defined. We performed a case-control study in a tertiary-care medical ICU, comparing 75 patients with unplanned extubation and 150 controls matched for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, presence of comorbid conditions, age, indication for MV, and sex. Forty-two (56%) patients required reintubation after unplanned extubation (74% immediately, 86% within 12 h). Thirty-three (44%) unplanned extubations occurred during weaning trials, and 30% of these patients needed reintubation (failed unplanned extubation). In contrast, 76% of patients with unplanned extubation occurring during ventilatory support required reintubation. Although mortality was similar to that of controls (failed unplanned extubation 40%, versus control 31%, p > 0.2), patients with failed unplanned extubation had a significantly longer duration of MV (19 versus 11 d, p < 0.01), longer stay in the ICU (21 versus 14 d, p < 0.05), and longer hospital stay (30 versus 21 d, p < 0.01), and survivors were more likely to require chronic care (64% versus 24%, p < 0.001). Successfully tolerated unplanned extubation was associated with a reduction in time from beginning of weaning to extubation (0.9 versus 2.0 d, p = 0.06), but with no difference in overall duration of MV, mortality, discharge location, ICU, or hospital stay as compared with these measures for controls. We conclude that unplanned extubation is not associated with increased mortality when compared with that of matched controls, although it does result in prolonged MV, longer ICU and hospital stay, and increased need for chronic care. These effects are due exclusively to patients who fail to tolerate unplanned extubation. Although successfully tolerated unplanned extubation decreased the duration of weaning trials, it had no other measurable beneficial impact on outcome.
非计划性拔管是经喉插管的一种主要并发症,但其对死亡率、机械通气(MV)时长、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、住院时长以及持续住院治疗需求的影响尚未得到充分界定。我们在一家三级医疗ICU开展了一项病例对照研究,比较了75例发生非计划性拔管的患者与150例在急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分、合并症存在情况、年龄、MV指征及性别方面相匹配的对照患者。42例(56%)患者在非计划性拔管后需要重新插管(74%立即重新插管,86%在12小时内重新插管)。33例(44%)非计划性拔管发生在撤机试验期间,其中30%的患者需要重新插管(非计划性拔管失败)。相比之下,在通气支持期间发生非计划性拔管的患者中有76%需要重新插管。尽管死亡率与对照组相似(非计划性拔管失败组为40%,对照组为31%,p>0.2),但非计划性拔管失败的患者MV持续时间显著更长(19天对11天,p<0.01),ICU住院时间更长(21天对14天,p<0.05),住院时间更长(30天对21天,p<0.01),且幸存者更有可能需要长期护理(64%对24%,p<0.001)。成功耐受非计划性拔管与从撤机开始到拔管的时间缩短相关(0.9天对2.0天,p = 0.06),但与对照组相比,在MV总时长、死亡率、出院地点、ICU或住院时长方面无差异。我们得出结论,与匹配的对照组相比,非计划性拔管与死亡率增加无关,尽管它确实会导致MV时间延长、ICU和住院时间延长以及长期护理需求增加。这些影响完全归因于无法耐受非计划性拔管的患者。尽管成功耐受非计划性拔管缩短了撤机试验的持续时间,但对结局没有其他可测量的有益影响。