Epstein S K, Ciubotaru R L, Wong J B
Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Chest. 1997 Jul;112(1):186-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.1.186.
To examine medical outcomes associated with reintubation for extubation failure after discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.
Prospective cohort study of consecutive intubated medical ICU patients who underwent a trial of extubation at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. The failed extubation group consisted of all patients reintubated within 72 h or within 7 days (if continuous ICU care had been required) of extubation. All others were considered to be successfully extubated. Study end points included hospital death vs survival, the number of days spent in the ICU and in the hospital after the onset of mechanical ventilation, the likelihood of requiring > or = 7 or > or = 14 days of ICU care after extubation, and the need for transfer to either a long-term care or rehabilitation facility among the survivors.
Of 289 intubated patients, 247 (85%) were successfully extubated, and 42 (15%) required reintubation for failed extubation (time to reintubation 1.5+/-0.2 days). Reintubation for extubation failure resulted in 12 additional days of mechanical ventilation. When compared with successfully extubated patients, reintubated patients were more likely to die in the hospital (43% vs 12%; p<0.0001), spend more time in the ICU (21.2+/-2.8 days vs 4.5+/-0.6 days; p<0.001) and in the hospital (30.5+/-3.3 days vs 16.3+/-1.2 days; p<0.001) after extubation, and require transfer to a long-term care or rehabilitation facility (38% vs 21%; p<0.05). Using multiple logistic regression, extubation failure was an independent predictor for death and the need for transfer to a long-term care facility. Compared with those successfully extubated, patients who failed extubation were seven times (p<0.0001) more likely to die, 31 times (p<0.0001) more likely to spend > or = 14 days in the ICU after extubation, and six times (p<0.001) more likely to need transfer to a long-term care or rehabilitation facility if they survived.
After adjusting for severity of illness and comorbid conditions, extubation failure had a significant independent association with increased risk for death, prolonged ICU stay, and transfer to a long-term care or rehabilitation facility. Extubation failure may serve as an additional independent marker of severity of illness. Alternatively, poor outcomes may be etiologically related to extubation failure. If the latter proves to be the case, identifying patients at risk for poor outcomes from extubation failure and instituting alternative care practices may reduce mortality, duration of ICU stay, and need for transfer to a long-term care facility.
探讨机械通气撤机失败后再次插管相关的医疗结局。
对一家三级护理教学医院中连续接受插管的内科重症监护病房患者进行前瞻性队列研究。撤机失败组包括所有在撤机后72小时内或7天内(若需要持续的重症监护病房护理)再次插管的患者。所有其他患者被视为撤机成功。研究终点包括院内死亡与存活情况、机械通气开始后在重症监护病房和医院的住院天数、撤机后需要≥7天或≥14天重症监护病房护理的可能性,以及存活患者转至长期护理或康复机构的需求。
289例插管患者中,247例(85%)撤机成功,42例(15%)因撤机失败需要再次插管(再次插管时间为1.5±0.2天)。撤机失败后的再次插管导致机械通气时间增加了12天。与撤机成功的患者相比,再次插管的患者更有可能在医院死亡(43%对12%;p<0.0001),撤机后在重症监护病房的时间更长(21.2±2.8天对4.5±0.6天;p<0.001),在医院的时间更长(30.5±3.3天对16.3±1.2天;p<0.001),并且需要转至长期护理或康复机构(38%对21%;p<0.05)。使用多因素逻辑回归分析,撤机失败是死亡和转至长期护理机构需求的独立预测因素。与撤机成功的患者相比,撤机失败的患者死亡可能性高7倍(p<0.0001),撤机后在重症监护病房停留≥14天的可能性高31倍(p<0.0001),若存活则转至长期护理或康复机构的可能性高6倍(p<0.001)。
在调整疾病严重程度和合并症后,撤机失败与死亡风险增加、重症监护病房住院时间延长以及转至长期护理或康复机构显著独立相关。撤机失败可能是疾病严重程度的另一个独立标志物。或者,不良结局可能在病因上与撤机失败相关。如果情况确实如此,识别撤机失败后预后不良风险的患者并采取替代护理措施可能会降低死亡率、缩短重症监护病房住院时间以及减少转至长期护理机构的需求。