Weiss B
Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):375-81. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3375.
For much of the history of toxicology, the sensitivity of the developing organism to chemical perturbation attracted limited attention. Several tragic episodes and new insights finally taught us that the course of early brain development incurs unique risks. Although the process is exquisitely controlled, its lability renders it highly susceptible to damage from environmental chemicals. Such disturbances, as recognized by current testing protocols and legislation such as the Food Quality Protection Act, can result in outcomes ranging from death to malformations to functional impairment. The latter are the most difficult to determine. First, they require a variety of measures to assay their extent. Second, adult responses may prove an inadequate guide to the response of the developing brain, which is part of the reason for proposing additional safety factors for children. Third, neuropsychological tests are deployed in complex circumstances in which many factors, including economic status, combine to produce a particular effect such as lowered intelligence quotient score. Fourth, the magnitude of the effect, for most environmental exposure levels, may be relatively small but extremely significant for public health. Fifth, changes in brain function occur throughout life, and some consequences of early damage may not even emerge until advanced age. Such factors need to be addressed in estimating the influence of a particular agent or group of agents on brain development and its functional expression. It is especially important to consider ways of dealing with multiple risks and their combinations in addition to the prevailing practice of estimating risks in isolation.
在毒理学发展历程的大部分时间里,发育中的生物体对化学干扰的敏感性并未引起太多关注。一些悲惨事件和新的见解最终让我们认识到,早期大脑发育过程存在独特的风险。尽管这个过程受到精确控制,但其易变性使其极易受到环境化学物质的损害。正如当前的测试方案以及《食品质量保护法》等法规所认可的那样,此类干扰可能导致从死亡到畸形再到功能障碍等一系列后果。而功能障碍是最难确定的。其一,确定其程度需要采取多种测量方法。其二,成人的反应可能无法充分指导发育中大脑的反应,这也是为儿童提出额外安全系数的部分原因。其三,神经心理学测试是在复杂的环境中进行的,在这种环境中,包括经济状况在内的许多因素共同作用,产生诸如智商分数降低等特定影响。其四,对于大多数环境暴露水平而言,影响的程度可能相对较小,但对公众健康却极为重要。其五,大脑功能的变化贯穿一生,早期损伤的一些后果甚至可能直到老年才显现出来。在评估特定一种或一组因素对大脑发育及其功能表达的影响时,需要考虑这些因素。除了目前孤立评估风险的做法外,考虑应对多种风险及其组合的方法尤为重要。