van Heeswijk R P, Veldkamp A I, Mulder J W, Meenhorst P L, Wit F W, Lange J M, Danner S A, Foudraine N A, Kwakkelstein M O, Reiss P, Beijnen J H, Hoetelmans R M
Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
AIDS. 2000 May 26;14(8):F77-82. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200005260-00001.
To investigate and to compare the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in a dosing regimen of 400 mg once daily versus 200 mg twice daily in HIV-1-infected individuals.
Open-label, randomized, cross-over study.
Twenty HIV-1-infected individuals who already used nevirapine as part of their antiretroviral regimen were randomized to continue their current regimen (200 mg twice daily) or to switch to the alternate regimen (400 mg once daily). The steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed after 2 weeks during a 24-h period. Subsequently, patients were switched to the alternate regimen and the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine were assessed again after 2 weeks. Non-compartmental methods were used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC[24h]), and the maximal (Cmax) and minimal plasma concentration (Cmin), the time to Cmax (t(max)), the plasma elimination half-life (t1/2), the apparent oral clearance (Cl/F) and the apparent volume of distribution (V/F). Differences in these pharmacokinetic parameters for the two dosing regimens were tested using ANOVA.
The exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the AUC[24h], was not significantly different between the 400 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen (P = 0.60). Furthermore, the values for t(max), t1/2 Cl/F and V/F were not significantly different between the two dosing regimens (P > or = 0.08). However, Cmax and Cmin were higher and lower, respectively, when nevirapine was used in the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The median values for Cmax and Cmin as measured for the once daily and twice daily regimens were 6.69 and 5.74 microg/ml, respectively (P = 0.03), and 2.88 and 3.73 microg/ml, respectively (P < 0.01).
These data show that the daily exposure to nevirapine, as measured by the plasma AUC[24h], is not different between a 400 mg once daily and a 200 mg twice daily dosing regimen. However, Cmax and Cmin are higher and lower, respectively, for the once daily regimen as compared with the twice daily regimen. The clinical implications of these differences remain to be established.
研究并比较在人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染者中,奈韦拉平每日一次400mg给药方案与每日两次200mg给药方案的稳态血浆药代动力学。
开放标签、随机、交叉研究。
20名已将奈韦拉平作为抗逆转录病毒治疗方案一部分的HIV-1感染者被随机分组,继续其当前治疗方案(每日两次200mg)或换用替代方案(每日一次400mg)。在24小时期间,于2周后评估奈韦拉平的稳态血浆药代动力学。随后,患者换用替代方案,并在2周后再次评估奈韦拉平的药代动力学。采用非房室模型方法计算血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC[24h])、最大(Cmax)和最小血浆浓度(Cmin)、达峰时间(t(max))、血浆消除半衰期(t1/2)、表观口服清除率(Cl/F)和表观分布容积(V/F)。使用方差分析检验两种给药方案这些药代动力学参数的差异。
以AUC[24h]衡量,每日一次400mg给药方案与每日两次200mg给药方案的奈韦拉平暴露量无显著差异(P = 0.60)。此外,两种给药方案的t(max)、t1/2、Cl/F和V/F值无显著差异(P≥0.08)。然而,与每日两次给药方案相比,每日一次给药方案使用奈韦拉平时,Cmax较高而Cmin较低。每日一次和每日两次给药方案测量的Cmax和Cmin中位数分别为6.69和5.74μg/ml(P = 0.03),以及2.88和3.73μg/ml(P < 0.01)。
这些数据表明,以血浆AUC[24h]衡量,每日一次400mg给药方案与每日两次200mg给药方案的奈韦拉平每日暴露量无差异。然而,与每日两次给药方案相比,每日一次给药方案的Cmax较高而Cmin较低。这些差异的临床意义仍有待确定。