Grosskurth H, Gray R, Hayes R, Mabey D, Wawer M
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Lancet. 2000 Jun 3;355(9219):1981-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02336-9.
Two randomised controlled trials of sexually transmitted disease (STD) treatment for the prevention of HIV-1 Infection, in Mwanza, Tanzania, and Rakai, Uganda, unexpectedly produced contrasting results. A decrease in population HIV-1 incidence was associated with improved STD case management in Mwanza, but was not associated with STD mass treatment in Rakai. Some reductions in curable STDs were seen in both studies. These trials tested different interventions in different HIV-1 epidemic settings and used different evaluation methods; the divergent results may be complementary rather than contradictory. Possible explanations include: differences in stage of the HIV-1 epidemic, which can influence exposure to HIV-1 and the distribution of viral load in the infected population; potential differences in the prevalence of Incurable STDs (such as genital herpes); perhaps greater Importance of symptomatic than symptomless STDs for HIV-1 transmission; and possibly greater effectiveness of continuously available services than of intermittent mass treatment to control rapid STD reinfection. Implications of the trials for policy and future research agenda are discussed.
在坦桑尼亚的姆万扎和乌干达的拉凯进行的两项关于性传播疾病(STD)治疗以预防HIV-1感染的随机对照试验,意外地产生了截然不同的结果。在姆万扎,人群HIV-1发病率的下降与性传播疾病病例管理的改善有关,但在拉凯,这与性传播疾病的大规模治疗无关。两项研究中可治愈的性传播疾病都有一定程度的减少。这些试验在不同的HIV-1流行环境中测试了不同的干预措施,并使用了不同的评估方法;这些不同的结果可能是互补的而非矛盾的。可能的解释包括:HIV-1流行阶段的差异,这可能影响对HIV-1的暴露以及感染人群中病毒载量的分布;不可治愈的性传播疾病(如生殖器疱疹)患病率的潜在差异;也许有症状的性传播疾病比无症状的性传播疾病对HIV-1传播更为重要;以及持续可用的服务在控制性传播疾病快速再感染方面可能比间歇性大规模治疗更有效。文中讨论了这些试验对政策和未来研究议程的影响。