Nowotarski P J, Turen C H, Brumback R J, Scarboro J M
Section of Orthopaedic Traumatology, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, The University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jun;82(6):781-8.
BACKGROUND: From 1989 to 1997, 1507 fractures of the shaft of the femur were treated with intramedullary nailing at The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center. Fifty-nine (4 percent) of those fractures were treated with early external fixation followed by planned conversion to intramedullary nail fixation. This two-stage stabilization protocol was selected for patients who were critically ill and poor candidates for an immediate intramedullary procedure or who required expedient femoral fixation followed by repair of an ipsilateral vascular injury. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether this protocol is an appropriate alternative for the management of fractures of the femur in patients who are poor candidates for immediate intramedullary nailing. METHODS: Fifty-four multiply injured patients with a total of fifty-nine fractures of the shaft of the femur treated with external fixation followed by planned conversion to intramedullary nail fixation were evaluated in a retrospective review to gather demographic, injury, management, and fracture-healing data for analysis. RESULTS: The average Injury Severity Score for the fifty-four patients was 29 (range, 13 to 43); the average Glasgow Coma Scale score was 11 (range, 3 to 15). Most patients (forty-four) had additional orthopaedic injuries (average, three; range, zero to eight), and associated injuries such as severe brain injury, solid-organ rupture, chest trauma, and aortic tears were common. Forty fractures were closed, and nineteen fractures were open. According to the system of Gustilo and Anderson, three of the open fractures were type II, eight were type IIIA, and eight were type IIIC. Intramedullary nailing was delayed secondary to medical instability in forty-six patients and secondary to vascular injury in eight. All fractures of the shaft of the femur were stabilized with a unilateral external fixator within the first twenty-four hours after the injury; the average duration of the procedure was thirty minutes. The duration of external fixation averaged seven days (range, one to forty-nine days) before the fixation with the static interlocked intramedullary nail. Forty-nine of the nailing procedures were antegrade, and ten were retrograde. For fifty-five of the fifty-nine fractures, the external fixation was converted to intramedullary nail fixation in a one-stage procedure. The other four fractures were associated with draining pin sites, and skeletal traction to allow pin-site healing was used for an average of ten days (range, eight to fifteen days) after fixator removal and before intramedullary nailing. Follow-up averaged twelve months (range, six to eighty-seven months). Of the fifty-eight fractures available for follow-up until union, fifty-six (97 percent) healed within six months. There were three major complications: one patient died from a pulmonary embolism before union, one patient had a refractory infected nonunion, and one patient had a nonunion with nail failure, which was successfully treated with retrograde exchange nailing. The infection rate was 1.7 percent. Four other patients required a minor reoperation: two were managed with manipulation under anesthesia because of knee stiffness, and two underwent derotation and relocking of the nail because of rotational malalignment. The rate of unplanned reoperations was 11 percent. The average range of motion of the knee was 107 degrees (range, 60 to 140 degrees). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that immediate external fixation followed by early closed intramedullary nailing is a safe treatment method for fractures of the shaft of the femur in selected multiply injured patients.
背景:1989年至1997年期间,R·亚当斯·考利创伤中心对1507例股骨干骨折采用髓内钉固定治疗。其中59例(4%)骨折先采用早期外固定,随后计划转换为髓内钉固定。对于病情危重、不适合立即进行髓内手术的患者,或需要迅速进行股骨固定并随后修复同侧血管损伤的患者,选择了这种两阶段稳定方案。本研究的目的是确定该方案对于那些不适合立即进行髓内钉固定的股骨骨折患者的治疗是否是一种合适的替代方法。 方法:对54例多处受伤且共59例股骨干骨折患者进行回顾性评估,这些患者先接受外固定,随后计划转换为髓内钉固定,以收集人口统计学、损伤、治疗和骨折愈合数据进行分析。 结果:54例患者的平均损伤严重度评分是29分(范围13至43分);平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为11分(范围3至15分)。大多数患者(44例)有其他骨科损伤(平均3处;范围0至8处),严重脑损伤、实体器官破裂、胸部创伤和主动脉撕裂等相关损伤很常见。40例骨折为闭合性,19例骨折为开放性。根据 Gustilo 和 Anderson 分类系统,19例开放性骨折中,3例为II型,8例为IIIA型,8例为IIIC型。46例患者因病情不稳定、8例患者因血管损伤而延迟进行髓内钉固定。所有股骨干骨折均在受伤后24小时内用单侧外固定架固定;手术平均持续时间为30分钟。在使用静态交锁髓内钉固定前,外固定平均持续7天(范围1至49天)。59例骨折中有49例髓内钉固定手术为顺行,10例为逆行。59例骨折中有55例通过一期手术将外固定转换为髓内钉固定。另外4例骨折伴有引流针道,在拆除固定架后且髓内钉固定前,平均使用骨牵引10天(范围8至15天)以促进针道愈合。随访平均12个月(范围6至87个月)。在可随访至骨折愈合的58例骨折中,56例(97%)在6个月内愈合。有3例主要并发症:1例患者在骨折愈合前死于肺栓塞,1例患者出现难治性感染性骨不连,1例患者出现骨不连且髓内钉失效,经逆行交锁髓内钉更换成功治疗。感染率为1.7%。另外4例患者需要进行小手术:2例因膝关节僵硬在麻醉下手法治疗,2例因旋转畸形进行髓内钉的旋转和重新锁定。计划外再次手术率为11%。膝关节平均活动范围为107度(范围60至140度)。 结论:我们得出结论,对于部分多处受伤的患者,立即进行外固定随后早期闭合髓内钉固定是治疗股骨干骨折的一种安全治疗方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991-12
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005-3
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999-6
J Orthop Trauma. 2001
J Orthop Trauma. 1998
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989-10
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024-11-1
Acta Ortop Bras. 2024-6-24
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023-5-20
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-3-17