Leyendecker C
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1975 Aug;14(3):150-9.
The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) Is it more effective to treat spastic cerebral palsy with the Hufschmidt electrical stimulation therapy combined with the Bobath neuro-development treatment or only with the Bobath therapy? (2) Can a general increase in activity be obtained by the electrotherapeutic muscle stimulation? A test group (combined Hufschmidt/Bobath therapy) and a control group (Bobath), both consisting of 10 subjects, were observed for four months. The duration of observation was divided into two four months treatment periods with a rest interval of two months in between. At the start of therapeutic measures, motor activity and psychic condition were tested with corresponding motormetric and psychodiagnostic techniques; three check-up examinations were carried out at the end of the first, and at the beginning and end of the second period of treatment. The motor-metric control examination showed that at the end of the first period the test group had achieved by far the better results, but at the end of the second therapeutic period, both groups were equally successful. The combined electrophysiotherapy hence reached in a relatively shorter time - as it were by leaps and bounds - the optimal obtainable state of functional improvements which, with the Bobath therapy alone, can be effected more slowly but with more continuity. The psychodiagnostic controls clearly indicate that the electrical stimulation produced an unspecified increase in activity, especially after the first phase of treatment, whereas in the second phase this could only be proven in a graded form. The report closes with an examination of the results and their consequences for the implementation of the treatment for cerebral palsied children.
(1)将胡夫施密特电刺激疗法与博巴斯神经发育疗法相结合治疗痉挛型脑瘫,是否比仅采用博巴斯疗法更有效?(2)通过电刺激肌肉能否使活动普遍增加?对一个试验组(胡夫施密特/博巴斯联合疗法)和一个对照组(博巴斯疗法)进行了观察,两组均由10名受试者组成,观察期为四个月。观察期分为两个为期四个月的治疗阶段,中间有两个月的休息间隔。在治疗措施开始时,用相应的运动测量和心理诊断技术对运动活动和心理状况进行测试;在第一个阶段结束时以及第二个治疗阶段的开始和结束时进行了三次检查。运动测量对照检查表明,在第一阶段结束时,试验组取得了迄今为止更好的结果,但在第二个治疗阶段结束时,两组同样成功。因此,联合电生理疗法在相对较短的时间内——可以说是跨越式地——达到了功能改善的最佳可获得状态,而仅采用博巴斯疗法虽然效果更慢,但更具持续性。心理诊断对照清楚地表明,电刺激使活动出现了未明确的增加,尤其是在治疗的第一阶段之后,而在第二阶段,这只能以分级的形式得到证实。报告最后对结果及其对脑瘫儿童治疗实施的影响进行了审视。