• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态风险评估需要通用的评估终点。

Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment.

作者信息

Suter G W

机构信息

National Center for Environmental Assessment-Cincinnati, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OH 45268, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):173-8. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.202018.

DOI:10.1111/0272-4332.202018
PMID:10859778
Abstract

This article presents arguments for the development of generic assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment. Generic assessment endpoints would be ecological entities and attributes that are assumed to be worthy of protection in most contexts. The existence of generic assessment endpoints would neither create a requirement that they be used in every assessment nor preclude the use of other assessment endpoints. They would simply be a starting point in the process of identifying the assessment endpoints for a particular assessment. They are needed to meet legal mandates, to provide a floor for environmental degradation, to provide some consistency in environmental regulation, as exemplars for site- or project-specific assessment endpoints, to allow development of methods and models, to give risk managers the courage to act, for screening and site-independent assessments, to support environmental monitoring, to facilitate communication, and to avoid paralysis by analysis. Generic assessment endpoints should include not only a list of entities and attributes, but also explanations of each endpoint, guidance on their use and interpretation, and measures and models that could be used to estimate them.

摘要

本文提出了关于为生态风险评估制定通用评估终点的论据。通用评估终点将是生态实体和属性,假定在大多数情况下它们值得受到保护。通用评估终点的存在既不会产生在每项评估中都必须使用它们的要求,也不会排除使用其他评估终点。它们仅仅是为特定评估确定评估终点过程中的一个起点。需要它们来满足法律要求,为环境退化设定一个底线,在环境监管中提供一定的一致性,作为特定场地或项目评估终点的范例,以便开发方法和模型,让风险管理者有采取行动的勇气,用于筛选和与场地无关的评估,支持环境监测,促进沟通,并避免因过度分析而陷入瘫痪。通用评估终点不仅应包括实体和属性列表,还应包括每个终点的解释、关于其使用和解释的指南,以及可用于估计它们的措施和模型。

相似文献

1
Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment.生态风险评估需要通用的评估终点。
Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):173-8. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.202018.
2
Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.作为生态风险评估终点的生态系统服务
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Jul;12(3):522-8. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1707. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
3
Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.将生态风险转化为生态系统服务损失。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Oct;5(4):500-14. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2009-009.1.
4
A blueprint for the problem formulation phase of EPA-type ecological risk assessments for 316(b) determinations.用于316(b)条款判定的美国环境保护局(EPA)类型生态风险评估问题制定阶段的蓝图。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 Jun 25;2 Suppl 1:271-98. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.862.
5
Ecological risk assessment in the United States environmental protection agency: a historical overview.美国环境保护局的生态风险评估:历史概述。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2008 Jul;4(3):285-9. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2007-062. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
Coordinating ecological restoration options analysis and risk assessment to improve environmental outcomes.协调生态恢复方案分析与风险评估以改善环境成果。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Apr;12(2):253-63. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1673. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability.生态概念模型:佛罗里达州南部可持续发展的生态系统管理框架及案例研究
Sci Total Environ. 2001 Jul 2;274(1-3):231-53. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00746-x.
9
Primer for evaluating ecological risk at petroleum release sites.
Drug Chem Toxicol. 1999 Feb;22(1):311-6. doi: 10.3109/01480549909029738.
10
Population-scale assessment endpoints in ecological risk assessment. Part 1: Reflections of stakeholder values.生态风险评估中的种群规模评估终点。第1部分:利益相关者价值观的反映。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2006 Jan;2(1):86-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying ecosystem services for pre-market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors.将生态系统服务应用于受监管压力源的上市前环境风险评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 8;17(Suppl 1):e170705. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170705. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy.将生态系统特征与最终生态系统服务联系起来,以制定公共政策。
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jan;18(1):108-18. doi: 10.1111/ele.12389. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops.
环境变化对转基因作物上市后环境监测的决策制定提出挑战。
Transgenic Res. 2011 Dec;20(6):1191-201. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9524-8. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants.转基因植物环境风险评估中的问题表述。
Transgenic Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):425-36. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Ecological risk assessment and problem formulation for Lake Uluabat, a Ramsar State in Turkey.土耳其拉姆萨尔湿地乌鲁巴特湖的生态风险评估与问题阐述
Environ Manage. 2004 Jun;33(6):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-2864-x.