Gregorius H R
Institut für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung, Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweng 2, Göttingen, D-37077, Germany.
J Theor Biol. 2000 Jul 7;205(1):121-31. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2049.
The development of an individual's phenotype is influenced by environmental factors (the modifying environment) which may differ from those factors (the adaptive environment) that decide on the adaptational value of the developed phenotype. The shapes of adaptationally optimal norms of reaction are therefore essentially determined by associations between these two environmental components together with the degree of adaptational sensitivity of the developed phenotypes. Two complementary aspects of optimality are accounted for: (a) environments can be optimal for a given norm of reaction and (b) norms of reaction can be optimal for a given environment. The results are obtained for random distribution of genotypes over environmental conditions and under the physiologically reasonable premise that fitness is a function of the costs of modification and adaptation. It turned out that the associations of adaptive and modifying environments are the primary sources of adaptational optimization. More specifically, it is shown that (i) independence between the two environmental components constitutes an adaptationally optimal environment only for norms of reaction in which all phenotypes are adaptively insensitive; (ii) if costs of modification do not depend on the environment, and if the two environmental components are not associated, adaptationally optimal norms of reaction can always be realized through phenogenetic invariance; (iii) as a rule, adaptively sensitive phenotypes developed under strong environmental associations necessitate phenogenetic plasticity for the optimal norm of reaction; (iv) a norm of reaction which is adaptationally optimal in its adaptationally optimal environment can always be realized through phenogenetic invariance, if costs of modification do not vary with the environment. These results reveal an important role of patterns of adaptive sensitivity of phenotypes, which may even surpass that of shapes of norms of reaction in adaptational processes.
个体表型的发育受到环境因素(修饰环境)的影响,这些因素可能与决定已发育表型适应价值的因素(适应环境)不同。因此,适应性最优反应规范的形状本质上是由这两个环境成分之间的关联以及已发育表型的适应敏感性程度决定的。最优性的两个互补方面得到了考虑:(a)环境对于给定的反应规范可能是最优的;(b)反应规范对于给定的环境可能是最优的。在基因型在环境条件下随机分布以及适应性是修饰和适应成本的函数这一生理学上合理的前提下,得出了结果。结果表明,适应性环境和修饰环境的关联是适应性优化的主要来源。更具体地说,研究表明:(i)两个环境成分之间的独立性仅对所有表型适应性不敏感的反应规范构成适应性最优环境;(ii)如果修饰成本不依赖于环境,并且两个环境成分不相关,那么适应性最优反应规范总能通过表型发生不变性来实现;(iii)通常,在强环境关联下发育的适应性敏感表型需要表型发生可塑性才能形成最优反应规范;(iv)如果修饰成本不随环境变化,那么在其适应性最优环境中适应性最优的反应规范总能通过表型发生不变性来实现。这些结果揭示了表型适应性敏感模式的重要作用,在适应过程中,其作用甚至可能超过反应规范的形状。