Charman C, Williams H
Department of Dermatology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England.
Arch Dermatol. 2000 Jun;136(6):763-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.6.763.
An essential component of evidence-based medicine is the use of valid and reliable outcome measures in clinical trials. There is much confusion in the field of atopic eczema regarding how to best measure disease severity objectively.
To establish the extent to which existing objective clinical scales for atopic eczema have been tested for validity, reliability, sensitivity to change, and acceptability.
An electronic bibliographic search was performed for published data on all currently available named atopic eczema scales.
Thirteen scales were identified in total. Data on construct or criterion validity were available for 10 scales. Only 5 scales had been tested for reliability (interobserver variability, intraobserver variability, or internal consistency). Data on responsiveness to change were available for 8 scales. An estimated time to administer the measure had been given for 3 scales. The only severity scale for which published data could be found on validity, reliability, sensitivity, and acceptability testing was the Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis index, although problems occurred with interobserver variation of the index.
The rapidly increasing number of severity scales for atopic eczema, many of which have been inadequately tested, has made the interpretation of patient outcomes confusing, and comparison of results between studies almost impossible. Consensus among clinicians and researchers on the use of severity scales for atopic eczema should be based on evidence of adequate validity), reliability, sensitivity to change, and ease of use.
循证医学的一个重要组成部分是在临床试验中使用有效且可靠的结局指标。在特应性皮炎领域,对于如何最好地客观测量疾病严重程度存在很多困惑。
确定现有的特应性皮炎客观临床量表在有效性、可靠性、对变化的敏感性和可接受性方面的测试程度。
对所有当前可用的特应性皮炎命名量表的已发表数据进行电子文献检索。
总共确定了13个量表。10个量表有关于结构效度或标准效度的数据。只有5个量表进行了可靠性测试(观察者间变异性、观察者内变异性或内部一致性)。8个量表有关于对变化的反应性的数据。3个量表给出了估计的测量实施时间。唯一能找到关于效度、可靠性、敏感性和可接受性测试的已发表数据的严重程度量表是特应性皮炎严重程度评分指数,尽管该指数存在观察者间差异的问题。
特应性皮炎严重程度量表的数量迅速增加,其中许多量表测试不充分,这使得对患者结局的解释变得混乱,并且几乎不可能在研究之间比较结果。临床医生和研究人员就特应性皮炎严重程度量表的使用达成共识应基于充分的效度、可靠性、对变化的敏感性和易用性的证据。