Suppr超能文献

对由Cerec CAD/CAM系统加工的烧结陶瓷和玻璃陶瓷嵌体的8年评估。

An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system.

作者信息

Pallesen U, van Dijken J W

机构信息

Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2000 Jun;108(3):239-46. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003239.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cerec CAD/CAM inlays processed of two industrially made machinable ceramics during an 8-yr follow-up period. Each of 16 patients received two similar ceramic inlays. Half the number of the inlays were made of a feldspathic (Vita Mark II) and the other of a glass ceramic (Dicor MGC) block. The inlays were luted with a dual resin composite and evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 8 months, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 yr, and indirectly using models. At baseline, 84% of the inlays were estimated as optimal and 16% as acceptable. Postoperative sensitivity was reported by one patient for 8 months. Of the 32 inlays evaluated during the 8 yr, 3 failed due to fracture of the material. No secondary caries was found adjacent to the inlays. No significant differences in the clinical performance were found between inlays made of the two ceramics. It can be concluded that the CAD/CAM inlays processed of the two ceramics functioned well during the 8-yr follow-up period.

摘要

本研究的目的是在8年的随访期内评估由两种工业制造的可加工陶瓷制作的Cerec CAD/CAM嵌体。16名患者每人接受了两个相似的陶瓷嵌体。其中一半嵌体由长石质陶瓷(维他第二代)制成,另一半由玻璃陶瓷(Dicor MGC)块制成。嵌体用双固化树脂复合材料粘结,并在基线、8个月、2年、3年、5年、6年和8年时使用改良的美国公共卫生服务标准进行临床评估,并通过模型进行间接评估。基线时,84%的嵌体被评估为最佳,16%为可接受。一名患者报告术后敏感持续了8个月。在8年期间评估的32个嵌体中,有3个因材料断裂而失败。在嵌体附近未发现继发龋。两种陶瓷制成的嵌体在临床性能上没有显著差异。可以得出结论,两种陶瓷制作的CAD/CAM嵌体在8年的随访期内功能良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验