Page E H, Esswein E J, Petersen M R, Lewis D M, Bledsoe T A
Epidemic Intelligence Service, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Jun;42(6):613-20. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200006000-00010.
Exposure to natural rubber latex may cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Published latex sensitization prevalence rates range from 2.9% to 22% among health care workers, and from 0.12% to about 20% of occupationally unexposed populations. In this study, self-administered questionnaires addressed job and personal characteristics, glove use, and symptoms in two groups of hospital workers: those who regularly used latex gloves and those who did not. Serum was tested for latex-specific immunoglobulin E. Air, surface, and air-filter dust samples for natural rubber latex were collected. The prevalence of latex sensitization was 6.3% in the non-users and 6.1% in the latex glove users (P = 0.9); 81.3% of sensitized workers were atopic compared with 59.5% of non-sensitized workers (P < 0.05). Reporting of work-related hand dermatitis was more common in the latex glove users (23.4%) than in the non-users (4.9%), as were rhino-conjunctivitis (16.3% and 7.9%, respectively, [P < 0.01]), and hand urticaria (9.9% and 2.1%, respectively, [P < 0.01]). There was no significant difference in work-related symptoms between the sensitized and non-sensitized workers. Environmental concentrations of latex were higher in the work areas of the non-sensitized workers, but higher in the clinical than in the non-clinical areas. Occupational latex glove use was not a risk factor for sensitization.
接触天然橡胶乳胶可能会引起即刻过敏反应。已公布的医护人员中乳胶致敏患病率在2.9%至22%之间,职业未接触人群中的患病率在0.12%至约20%之间。在本研究中,通过自行填写问卷调查了两组医院工作人员的工作和个人特征、手套使用情况及症状:一组是经常使用乳胶手套的人员,另一组是不使用乳胶手套的人员。检测血清中的乳胶特异性免疫球蛋白E。采集了天然橡胶乳胶的空气、表面及空气过滤器灰尘样本。不使用乳胶手套者的乳胶致敏患病率为6.3%,使用乳胶手套者为6.1%(P = 0.9);致敏工作人员中81.3%为特应性体质,而非致敏工作人员中这一比例为59.5%(P < 0.05)。与不使用乳胶手套者(4.9%)相比,使用乳胶手套者(23.4%)报告的与工作相关的手部皮炎更为常见,鼻结膜炎(分别为16.3%和7.9%,[P < 0.01])及手部荨麻疹(分别为9.9%和2.1%,[P < 0.01])也是如此。致敏和非致敏工作人员之间与工作相关的症状无显著差异。非致敏工作人员工作区域的乳胶环境浓度较高,但临床区域高于非临床区域。职业性使用乳胶手套并非致敏的危险因素。