Poresky R H, Clark K, Daniels A M
School of Family Studies and Human Services, College of Human Ecology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1403, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2000 Jun;86(3 Pt 1):819-26. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.3.819.
The internal structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies--Depression Scale was examined within the context of a three-year longitudinal study of 80 low-income parents of young children. The baseline, first-year, and second-year follow-up home interviews included the scale. Principal components factor analyses with varimax rotation yielded six factors for the baseline data, and five factors for the follow-up data with different items loading on different factors each year suggesting some instability of the factors. Cronbach alpha estimates of the internal consistency of the original factors showed satisfactory values for Depressed Affect, Positive Affect, and possibly Somatic, but not for Interpersonal. However, alpha for the total score was very strong. Positive Affect and the total score also showed stability over the three administrations. These results question the use of the original factor scores for the CES-Depression as subscales but support the use of the total score as a measure of depression.
在一项针对80名低收入幼儿父母的为期三年的纵向研究中,对流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的内部结构进行了检验。基线、第一年和第二年的随访家庭访谈均包含该量表。采用方差最大化旋转的主成分因子分析得出,基线数据有六个因子,随访数据有五个因子,每年不同项目在不同因子上的载荷不同,这表明因子存在一定的不稳定性。对原始因子内部一致性的克朗巴赫α估计显示,抑郁情绪、积极情绪以及可能的躯体症状方面的值令人满意,但人际关系方面则不然。然而,总分的α值非常高。积极情绪和总分在三次施测中也表现出稳定性。这些结果对将CES - 抑郁量表的原始因子得分用作分量表提出了质疑,但支持将总分用作抑郁的一种度量。