Marras W S, Jorgensen M J, Davis K G
Department of Industrial, Welding, and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
Ergonomics. 2000 May;43(5):653-68. doi: 10.1080/001401300184314.
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading and trunk, hip and knee kinematics while allowing subjects to move their feet during lifting exertions. Predicted spinal forces and moments about the L5/S1 intervertebral disc from a three-dimensional EMG-assisted biomechanical model, trunk position, velocities and accelerations, and hip and knee angles were evaluated as a function of wearing an elastic lumbar back support, while lifting two different box weights (13.6 and 22.7 kg) from two different heights (knee and 10 cm above knee height), and from two different asymmetries at the start of the lift (sagittally symmetric and 60 degrees asymmetry). Subjects were allowed to lift using any lifting style they preferred, and were allowed to move their feet during the lifting exertion. Wearing a lumbar back support resulted in no significant differences for any measure of spinal loading as compared with the no-back support condition. However, wearing a lumbar back support resulted in a modest but significant decrease in the maximum sagittal flexion angle (36.5 to 32.7 degrees), as well as reduction in the sagittal trunk extension velocity (47.2 to 40.2 degrees s(-1)). Thus, the use of the elastic lumbar back support provided no protective effect regarding spinal loading when individuals were allowed to move their feet during a lifting exertion.
本研究的目的是评估弹性腰部支撑对脊柱负荷以及躯干、髋部和膝部运动学的影响,同时允许受试者在提举过程中移动双脚。根据三维肌电图辅助生物力学模型预测的L5/S1椎间盘处的脊柱力和力矩、躯干位置、速度和加速度以及髋部和膝部角度,作为佩戴弹性腰部支撑的函数进行评估,同时从两个不同高度(膝盖高度和膝盖上方10厘米)以及提举开始时的两种不同不对称情况(矢状面对称和60度不对称)提举两种不同重量的箱子(13.6千克和22.7千克)。允许受试者采用他们喜欢的任何提举方式,并在提举过程中移动双脚。与不佩戴腰部支撑的情况相比,佩戴腰部支撑在任何脊柱负荷测量指标上均无显著差异。然而,佩戴腰部支撑导致最大矢状面屈曲角度适度但显著降低(从36.5度降至32.7度),以及矢状面躯干伸展速度降低(从47.2度/秒降至40.2度/秒)。因此,当个体在提举过程中被允许移动双脚时,使用弹性腰部支撑对脊柱负荷没有保护作用。