Mouroux M, Yvon-Groussin A, Peytavin G, Delaugerre C, Legrand M, Bossi P, Do B, Trylesinski A, Diquet B, Dohin E, Delfraissy J F, Katlama C, Calvez V
Department of Virology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jul;38(7):2726-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.7.2726-2730.2000.
The MIKADO trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of stavudine-zalcitabine-saquinavir (soft gel capsule) [d4T-ddC-SQV(SGC)] in 36 naive patients (-3.3 log(10) units at week 24 [W24]). Among the 29 patients remaining on d4T-ddC-SQV(SGC) until W24, 10 harbored a virological failure (viral load of >200 copies/ml at W24) (group 1). To determine the reasons for therapeutic failure, genotypic and phenotypic resistance test results and SQV concentrations in plasma were analyzed and compared to those in successfully treated patients (viral load of <200 copies/ml at W24) (group 2). Reverse transcriptase and protease genotypic analyses in group 1 revealed the acquisition of only one SQV-associated mutation (L90M) in only two patients. There was no significant increase in the 50 or 90% inhibitory concentration of SQV in patients with or without the L90M mutation. However, the fact that two patients developed an L90M mutation only 4 weeks after relapse points to the need for genotypic resistance testing in the context of an initial failure of the antiretroviral regimen. At W24, the median SQV concentration in group 1 (71 ng/ml) was significantly lower than in group 2 (475 ng/ml), and the plasma SQV concentration was correlated with the viral load at W24 (r = -0.5; P<0.05) and with the drop in viral load between day 0 and W24 (r = -0.5; P<0.01). These results and the fact that the plasma SQV concentrations in the two groups prior to relapse (W12) were not significantly different strongly suggest that the early failure of this combination is not due to viral resistance but to a lack of compliance, pharmacological variability, and drug interactions or a combination of these factors.
MIKADO试验旨在评估司他夫定-扎西他滨-沙奎那韦(软胶囊)[d4T-ddC-SQV(SGC)]对36例初治患者的疗效(第24周时病毒载量下降-3.3 log(10) 单位)。在29例持续使用d4T-ddC-SQV(SGC)至第24周的患者中,10例出现病毒学失败(第24周时病毒载量>200拷贝/ml)(第1组)。为确定治疗失败的原因,分析了基因和表型耐药性检测结果以及血浆中沙奎那韦浓度,并与成功治疗的患者(第24周时病毒载量<200拷贝/ml)(第2组)进行比较。第1组的逆转录酶和蛋白酶基因分析显示,仅2例患者出现了一个与沙奎那韦相关的突变(L90M)。有无L90M突变患者的沙奎那韦50%或90%抑制浓度均无显著升高。然而,2例患者在复发仅4周后就出现了L90M突变,这表明在抗逆转录病毒治疗方案初治失败的情况下需要进行基因耐药性检测。在第24周时,第1组的沙奎那韦中位浓度(71 ng/ml)显著低于第2组(475 ng/ml),血浆沙奎那韦浓度与第24周时的病毒载量相关(r = -0.5;P<0.05),与第0天至第24周期间病毒载量的下降相关(r = -0.5;P<0.01)。这些结果以及两组复发前(第12周)血浆沙奎那韦浓度无显著差异这一事实强烈表明,该联合治疗方案的早期失败并非由于病毒耐药,而是由于依从性差、药理学变异性、药物相互作用或这些因素的综合作用。