Suppr超能文献

短暂性单眼盲患者、短暂性脑缺血发作患者与对照受试者之间脑血流动力学参数的比较。

A comparison of cerebral hemodynamic parameters between transient monocular blindness patients, transient ischemic attack patients and control subjects.

作者信息

Rutgers D R, Donders R C, Vriens E M, Kappelle L J, van der Grond J

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Jul-Aug;10(4):307-14. doi: 10.1159/000016075.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess whether patients with transient monocular blindness (TMB) and patients with hemispheric transient ischemic attacks (hTIA) differ from each other with respect to cerebral hemodynamic parameters.

METHODS

Seventeen TMB patients and 23 hTIA patients with a moderate to severe stenosis or an occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, (1)H MR spectroscopy and transcranial Doppler sonography. Thirty-one control subjects were investigated to obtain reference values for the MR investigations. Quantitative flow was measured in the ICAs, the basilar artery and the middle cerebral arteries (MCA). Metabolic changes in the MCA territory were studied by assessing N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA)/choline ratios and prevalences of lactate. The prevalence of collateral flow was assessed in the circle of Willis and the ophthalmic arteries. The vasomotor reactivity was studied by measuring the CO(2) reactivity of the MCA territories.

RESULTS

Quantitative flow in the cerebropetal arteries and the MCAs did not differ between TMB patients and hTIA patients. Also patterns of collateral flow, prevalence of lactate and CO(2) reactivity were similar. The mean ipsilateral NAA/choline ratio was lower in hTIA patients compared with TMB patients (p < 0.01), and was predominantly correlated with symptomatology (p < 0.01), i.e. whether patients had TMB or hTIA, and not with ipsilateral MCA flow (p = 0.2) or ipsilateral CO(2) reactivity (p = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that there are no cerebral hemodynamic differences between TMB patients and hTIA patients. It is therefore unlikely that hemodynamic factors account for differences in clinical characteristics between the two patient groups.

摘要

目的

评估短暂性单眼盲(TMB)患者和半球短暂性脑缺血发作(hTIA)患者在脑血流动力学参数方面是否存在差异。

方法

17例TMB患者和23例伴有颈内动脉(ICA)中度至重度狭窄或闭塞的hTIA患者接受了磁共振(MR)血管造影、氢质子磁共振波谱(1H MRS)和经颅多普勒超声检查。对31名对照受试者进行了研究,以获取MR检查的参考值。测量了ICA、基底动脉和大脑中动脉(MCA)的定量血流。通过评估N-乙酰天门冬氨酸(NAA)/胆碱比值和乳酸的发生率,研究了MCA区域的代谢变化。评估了Willis环和眼动脉侧支血流的发生率。通过测量MCA区域的二氧化碳反应性研究了血管运动反应性。

结果

TMB患者和hTIA患者向心性动脉和MCA的定量血流无差异。侧支血流模式、乳酸发生率和二氧化碳反应性也相似。与TMB患者相比,hTIA患者同侧NAA/胆碱比值较低(p < 0.01),且主要与症状相关(p < 0.01),即患者是TMB还是hTIA,而与同侧MCA血流(p = 0.2)或同侧二氧化碳反应性(p = 0.7)无关。

结论

本研究结果表明,TMB患者和hTIA患者之间不存在脑血流动力学差异。因此,血流动力学因素不太可能解释这两组患者临床特征的差异。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验