• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过反义SLG基因转化改变甘蓝型油菜的自交不亲和表型。

Alteration of the self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica by transformation of the antisense SLG gene.

作者信息

Shiba H, Kimura N, Takayama S, Hinata K, Suzuki A, Isogai A

机构信息

Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.

出版信息

Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 May;64(5):1016-24. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.1016.

DOI:10.1271/bbb.64.1016
PMID:10879472
Abstract

Self-incompatible (SI) Brassica rapa (syn. B. campestris) was transformed with an antisense SLG gene by using SLG8 cDNA isolated from the B. campestris S8 homozygote. Two transformed lines were obtained and analyzed. Northern blot and Western blot analyses revealed that endogenous SLG and SRK were greatly reduced of the transcriptional and translational levels in the transformant. Pollination experiments confirmed that their SI phenotype had broken down. In addition, the progeny with the antisense SLG gene, resulting from self- or cross-pollination of the transgenic plant, also showed the self-compatible phenotype. The breakdown of SI in the tranformants was due to the change in property of the stigma and not of the pollen. These results provide strong evidence that SLG and/or SRK is implicated in the pollen-stigma recognition of SI and that they act only as stigmatic factors.

摘要

利用从白菜S8纯合子中分离得到的SLG8 cDNA,将自交不亲和(SI)的白菜(syn. B. campestris)用反义SLG基因进行转化。获得了两个转化株系并进行分析。Northern杂交和Western杂交分析表明,转化体中内源性SLG和SRK在转录和翻译水平上均大幅降低。授粉实验证实它们的SI表型已经打破。此外,转基因植株自花授粉或异花授粉产生的携带反义SLG基因的后代也表现出自交亲和表型。转化体中SI的打破是由于柱头特性的改变而非花粉特性的改变。这些结果提供了强有力的证据,表明SLG和/或SRK参与了SI的花粉-柱头识别,并且它们仅作为柱头因子起作用。

相似文献

1
Alteration of the self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica by transformation of the antisense SLG gene.通过反义SLG基因转化改变甘蓝型油菜的自交不亲和表型。
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 May;64(5):1016-24. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.1016.
2
Transformation of Arabidopsis with a Brassica SLG/SRK region and ARC1 gene is not sufficient to transfer the self-incompatibility phenotype.用芸苔属的SLG/SRK区域和ARC1基因转化拟南芥不足以传递自交不亲和表型。
Mol Gen Genet. 2000 May;263(4):648-54. doi: 10.1007/s004380051213.
3
Introduction of SLG (S locus glycoprotein) alters the phenotype of endogenous S haplotype, but confers no new S haplotype specificity in Brassica rapa L.SLG(S位点糖蛋白)的导入改变了内源S单倍型的表型,但在芜菁中并未赋予新的S单倍型特异性。
Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jul;40(4):659-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1006274525421.
4
Molecular characterization of the S locus in two self-incompatible Brassica napus lines.两个自交不亲和甘蓝型油菜品系中S位点的分子特征分析
Plant Cell. 1996 Dec;8(12):2369-80. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.12.2369.
5
A breakdown of Brassica self-incompatibility in ARC1 antisense transgenic plants.ARC1反义转基因植物中芸苔属植物自交不亲和性的破坏。
Science. 1999 Nov 26;286(5445):1729-31. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1729.
6
The S receptor kinase determines self-incompatibility in Brassica stigma.S受体激酶决定了芸苔属植物柱头中的自交不亲和性。
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):913-6. doi: 10.1038/35002628.
7
The S locus glycoprotein and the S receptor kinase are sufficient for self-pollen rejection in Brassica.S位点糖蛋白和S受体激酶足以介导芸苔属植物的自花花粉排斥反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3713-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3713.
8
Structural and transcriptional comparative analysis of the S locus regions in two self-incompatible Brassica napus lines.两个自交不亲和甘蓝型油菜品系S位点区域的结构和转录比较分析
Plant Cell. 1999 Nov;11(11):2217-31. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2217.
9
Direct ligand-receptor complex interaction controls Brassica self-incompatibility.直接的配体-受体复合物相互作用控制着芸苔属植物的自交不亲和性。
Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):534-8. doi: 10.1038/35097104.
10
Characterization of Brassica S-haplotypes lacking S-locus glycoprotein.缺乏S位点糖蛋白的芸苔属S单倍型的特征分析
FEBS Lett. 2000 Sep 29;482(1-2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)02048-2.

引用本文的文献

1
In-depth amino acid mutational analysis of the key interspecific incompatibility factor Stigmatic Privacy 1.关键种间不亲和因子柱头隐私1的深入氨基酸突变分析
Plant Cell Physiol. 2025 Jul 24;66(6):926-939. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaf039.
2
Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA) Promotes the Self-Pollen Tube Growth of by Regulating Lignin Biosynthesis.茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)通过调节木质素生物合成促进花粉管的自生长。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 5;25(19):10720. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910720.
3
Molecular mechanisms of self-incompatibility in Brassicaceae and Solanaceae.
芸薹属和茄属植物自交不亲和的分子机制。
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2024;100(4):264-280. doi: 10.2183/pjab.100.014.
4
SHI family transcription factors regulate an interspecific barrier.施氏转录因子调控种间屏障。
Nat Plants. 2023 Nov;9(11):1862-1873. doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01535-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: From evolution to breeding.分子水平上的自交不亲和系统研究进展:从进化到育种。
Plant Commun. 2024 Feb 12;5(2):100719. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100719. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
6
Genetic and Molecular Characterization of a Self-Compatible Line Possessing a New Class II Haplotype.具有新型II类单倍型的自交亲和系的遗传与分子特征分析
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;10(12):2815. doi: 10.3390/plants10122815.
7
Trans-acting small RNA determines dominance relationships in Brassica self-incompatibility.反式作用小 RNA 决定芸薹属自交不亲和中的优势关系。
Nature. 2010 Aug 19;466(7309):983-6. doi: 10.1038/nature09308.
8
The dominance of alleles controlling self-incompatibility in Brassica pollen is regulated at the RNA level.控制油菜花粉自交不亲和性的等位基因的显性作用在RNA水平受到调控。
Plant Cell. 2002 Feb;14(2):491-504. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010378.
9
Identification and characterization of a polymorphic receptor kinase gene linked to the self-incompatibility locus of Arabidopsis lyrata.与琴叶拟南芥自交不亲和位点连锁的一个多态性受体激酶基因的鉴定与表征
Genetics. 2001 May;158(1):387-99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.1.387.
10
A pollen coat protein, SP11/SCR, determines the pollen S-specificity in the self-incompatibility of Brassica species.一种花粉壁蛋白SP11/SCR决定了芸苔属植物自交不亲和性中的花粉S特异性。
Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):2095-103. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.4.2095.