Fudin R
Psychology Department, Long Island University, NY 11201, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Jun;90(3 Pt 1):740-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.740.
Methodological changes in subliminal psychodynamic activation experiments based on the assumption that multiletter messages can be encoded automatically (Birgegard & Sohlberg, 1999) are questioned. Their contention that partial experimental messages and appropriate nonsense anagram controls (Fudin, 1986) need not be presented in every experiment is supported, with a reservation. If the difference between responses to the complete message and its control is significant in the predicted direction, then Fudin's procedure should be used. A nonsignificant difference between the response to each partial message and its control is needed to support the assumption of proponents of subliminal psychodynamic activation that successful outcomes are effected by the encoding of the meaning of a complete message. Experiments in subliminal psychodynamic activation can be improved if their methodologies take into account variables that may operate when subliminal stimuli are presented and encoded.
基于多字母信息可自动编码这一假设（Birgegard & Sohlberg，1999）的阈下心理动力激活实验中的方法学变化受到质疑。他们认为不必在每个实验中都呈现部分实验信息和适当的无意义变位词对照（Fudin，1986）这一观点得到了有保留的支持。如果对完整信息及其对照的反应差异在预测方向上具有显著性，那么就应采用Fudin的程序。需要对每个部分信息及其对照的反应之间无显著差异，以支持阈下心理动力激活支持者的假设，即成功的结果是由完整信息意义的编码所产生的。如果阈下心理动力激活实验的方法学考虑到在呈现和编码阈下刺激时可能起作用的变量，那么这些实验可以得到改进。
