Lorenz M, Heinrich S, Staib-Sebler E, Köhne C H, Wils J, Nordlinger B, Encke A
Department of General and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 2000 May;36(8):957-65. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00073-3.
The treatment of pancreatic cancer is still problematic for physicians. Only 15% of patients present with resectable tumours, and systemic chemotherapy is of limited effectiveness. In order to achieve higher local drug concentrations in the tumour without causing the side-effects of a comparable level of systemic treatment, regional chemotherapy has been introduced as an alternative treatment. Several techniques have been developed over recent years, these include: celiac axis infusion (CAI), CAI with microspheres or haemofiltration, aortic stop flow (ASF) and isolated hypoxic perfusion (IHP). Whilst several authors have reported improved response rates and a prolongation of median survival time, these results have not been confirmed by others. In addition, the incidence of side-effects and the rate of technical complications have been reported to be high during regional chemotherapy. Except for a single trial containing 14 patients, no randomised trial comparing systemic and regional chemotherapy has been conducted. For these reasons, none of the reported treatment regimens can be considered to be standard treatment and in order to evaluate, if regional chemotherapy is indeed superior to systemic chemotherapy, randomised trials must be conducted.
对医生来说,胰腺癌的治疗仍然存在问题。只有15%的患者出现可切除肿瘤,全身化疗效果有限。为了在肿瘤中实现更高的局部药物浓度,同时又不引起同等程度全身治疗的副作用,区域化疗已被作为一种替代治疗方法引入。近年来已开发出几种技术,包括:腹腔动脉灌注(CAI)、带微球或血液滤过的CAI、主动脉阻断血流(ASF)和孤立性低氧灌注(IHP)。虽然有几位作者报告了缓解率提高和中位生存时间延长,但这些结果未得到其他作者的证实。此外,据报道区域化疗期间副作用的发生率和技术并发症的发生率很高。除了一项包含14名患者的单一试验外,尚未进行比较全身化疗和区域化疗的随机试验。由于这些原因,所报道的治疗方案均不能被视为标准治疗,为了评估区域化疗是否确实优于全身化疗,必须进行随机试验。