Guadagni S, Clementi M, Valenti M, Fiorentini G, Cantore M, Kanavos E, Caterino G P, Di Giuro G, Amicucci G
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;33(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.042. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
In the past decade, some authors have reported objective responses and prolonged median survival times using hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, these promising results have not been confirmed by others, making it difficult to define the effectiveness of this loco-regional chemotherapy. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the response rate, time to disease progression and overall survival following HAP treatment of 22 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic tumors. Within the period from 1999 to 2003, 22 patients with histological diagnosis of unresectable stage III/IV pancreatic cancer, not responsive to systemic chemotherapy, were treated with mitomycin C 30mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60mg/m(2) by HAP (stop flow technique). Immediately after perfusion, hemofiltration was performed to reduce systemic side toxic effects. Responses were assessed by CT-scan 30days from the end of treatment. Minor or partial responses were confirmed by a second CT-scan 4weeks later. Following 26 treatment cycles no death or technical complications were recorded; four patients (18.2%) achieved a partial response, 2 (9.1%) a minimal response and 13 (59.1%) stable disease. The remaining 3 patients (13.6%) showed progression of the disease. The median time to disease progression was 3 months (range 1-10). The median survival time from the start of regional chemotherapy was 6 months (range 1.9-16), with a 1-year survival rate of 9%. Our data show that HAP is a relatively effective second-line treatment for advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a low complication rate. We do not concur with the opinion of others that HAP is an inactive treatment approach. However, taking into account the invasiveness of this procedure, and associated morbidity and cost, HAP would not appear to be preferable to less invasive loco-regional chemotherapeutic alternatives.
在过去十年中,一些作者报告了使用缺氧腹部灌注(HAP)治疗晚期胰腺癌取得了客观缓解以及延长了中位生存时间。然而,这些令人鼓舞的结果并未得到其他研究的证实,这使得难以确定这种局部区域化疗的有效性。因此,本研究的目的是评估连续22例晚期胰腺肿瘤患者接受HAP治疗后的缓解率、疾病进展时间和总生存期。在1999年至2003年期间,22例经组织学诊断为不可切除的III/IV期胰腺癌且对全身化疗无反应的患者,采用丝裂霉素C 30mg/m²和顺铂60mg/m²通过HAP(停流技术)进行治疗。灌注后立即进行血液滤过以减少全身副作用。在治疗结束30天后通过CT扫描评估疗效。4周后通过第二次CT扫描确认轻微或部分缓解。经过26个治疗周期,未记录到死亡或技术并发症;4例患者(18.2%)获得部分缓解,2例(9.1%)获得最小缓解,13例(59.1%)疾病稳定。其余3例患者(13.6%)疾病进展。疾病进展的中位时间为3个月(范围1 - 10个月)。从区域化疗开始的中位生存时间为6个月(范围1.9 - 16个月),1年生存率为9%。我们的数据表明,HAP是晚期胰腺癌相对有效的二线治疗方法,并发症发生率较低。我们不同意其他人认为HAP是一种无效治疗方法的观点。然而,考虑到该手术的侵入性以及相关的发病率和成本,HAP似乎并不比侵入性较小的局部区域化疗替代方法更可取。