Suppr超能文献

来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效及安全性比较。

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Emery P, Breedveld F C, Lemmel E M, Kaltwasser J P, Dawes P T, Gömör B, Van Den Bosch F, Nordström D, Bjorneboe O, Dahl R, Horslev-Petersen K, Rodriguez De La Serna A, Molloy M, Tikly M, Oed C, Rosenburg R, Loew-Friedrich I

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jun;39(6):655-65. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.6.655.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind trial, 999 subjects with active RA were randomized to leflunomide (n = 501; loading dose 100 mg/day for 3 days, maintenance dose 20 mg/day) or methotrexate (n = 498; 10-15 mg/week) for 52 weeks. After 1 yr the subjects could choose to stay for a second year of double-blind treatment. The primary end-points were tender and swollen joint counts and overall physician and patient assessments. Analyses were of the intent-to-treat group.

RESULTS

After 1 yr, the mean changes in the leflunomide and methotrexate groups, respectively, were -8.3 and -9.7 for tender joint count; -6.8 and -9.0 for swollen joint count; -0.9 and -1.2 for physician global assessment; -0.9 and -1.2 for patient global assessment; -14.4 and -28.2 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Improvements seen with methotrexate were significantly greater than those with leflunomide. No further improvement occurred after the second year of treatment and the distinction between the two treatments in terms of tender joint count and patient global assessment was lost. During the first year of treatment, a small and equivalent degree of radiographically assessed disease progression was seen with both drugs. After 2 yr, disease progression was significantly less with methotrexate. The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were diarrhoea, nausea, alopecia, rash, headache, and elevated plasma liver enzyme levels. Over 2 yr, 21 subjects receiving methotrexate were withdrawn due to elevated plasma liver enzymes vs eight subjects taking leflunomide. Two drug-related deaths from pulmonary causes were recorded with methotrexate vs no drug-related deaths among the subjects receiving leflunomide.

CONCLUSIONS

Both leflunomide and methotrexate are efficacious for prolonged treatment of RA. At the doses used, some clinical benefit of methotrexate over leflunomide was observed in the first year of treatment. This benefit must be weighed against the potential toxicity of this drug when used without folate supplementation.

摘要

目的

比较来氟米特和甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

在这项多中心、双盲试验中,999例活动性RA患者被随机分为来氟米特组(n = 501;负荷剂量100mg/天,共3天,维持剂量20mg/天)或甲氨蝶呤组(n = 498;10 - 15mg/周),治疗52周。1年后,受试者可选择继续进行第二年的双盲治疗。主要终点为压痛关节数、肿胀关节数以及医生和患者的整体评估。分析采用意向性治疗组。

结果

1年后,来氟米特组和甲氨蝶呤组的平均变化分别为:压痛关节数 - 8.3和 - 9.7;肿胀关节数 - 6.8和 - 9.0;医生整体评估 - 0.9和 - 1.2;患者整体评估 - 0.9和 - 1.2;红细胞沉降率 - 14.4和 - 28.2。甲氨蝶呤的改善效果显著优于来氟米特。治疗第二年未出现进一步改善,且在压痛关节数和患者整体评估方面两种治疗方法的差异消失。在治疗的第一年,两种药物在影像学评估的疾病进展方面均有轻度且相当程度的进展。2年后,甲氨蝶呤的疾病进展明显较少。两组最常见的治疗相关不良事件为腹泻、恶心、脱发、皮疹、头痛和血浆肝酶水平升高。2年期间,21例接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的受试者因血浆肝酶升高而退出,而来氟米特组有8例。甲氨蝶呤记录到2例与药物相关的肺部原因死亡,而来氟米特组受试者中未出现与药物相关的死亡。

结论

来氟米特和甲氨蝶呤对RA的长期治疗均有效。在所使用的剂量下,治疗的第一年观察到甲氨蝶呤相对于来氟米特具有一定临床益处。在不补充叶酸使用该药物时,必须权衡这种益处与潜在毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验