• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用新型腹壁封闭装置的手辅助腹腔镜肾癌根治术

Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma using a new abdominal wall sealing device.

作者信息

Tanaka M, Tokuda N, Koga H, Yokomizo A, Sakamoto N, Naito S

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):314-8.

PMID:10893573
Abstract

PURPOSE

We report our initial experience with a hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with renal carcinoma, and compare our results to those of conventional open radical nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data on 6 consecutive patients who underwent hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma were reviewed. We performed hand assisted laparoscopic surgery using the new LAP DISC* abdominal wall sealing device. We compared the results of this procedure with those of conventional open radical nephrectomy in 12 patients with stage T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

The hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma was successfully performed without any major or minor complications in all 6 patients. Mean operation time for the laparoscopic group was significantly longer than that for the open surgery group (303 minutes versus 224 minutes, p = 0.0042). However, no significant difference was observed in mean estimated blood loss for the 2 groups (264 ml. in the laparoscopic group versus 341 ml. in the open surgery group). The frequency of parenteral analgesia postoperatively in the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the open surgery group (16.7% versus 75.0%, p = 0.043). In addition, the laparoscopic group seemed to recover more rapidly than the open surgery group. The abdominal wall sealing device was easy to attach to the abdominal wall, and allowed rapid hand removal and reinsertion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results indicate that a hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with the abdominal wall sealing device is an effective and safe surgical procedure, and is less invasive than open radical nephrectomy.

摘要

目的

我们报告对肾癌患者行手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的初步经验,并将我们的结果与传统开放性根治性肾切除术的结果进行比较。

材料与方法

回顾了连续6例接受手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗T1N0M0期肾细胞癌患者的临床资料。我们使用新型LAP DISC*腹壁封闭装置进行手辅助腹腔镜手术。我们将该手术的结果与12例T1N0M0期肾细胞癌患者的传统开放性根治性肾切除术的结果进行了比较。

结果

所有6例患者均成功进行了手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术,无任何大小并发症。腹腔镜组的平均手术时间明显长于开放手术组(303分钟对224分钟,p = 0.0042)。然而,两组的平均估计失血量无显著差异(腹腔镜组为264 ml,开放手术组为341 ml)。腹腔镜组术后胃肠外镇痛的频率明显低于开放手术组(16.7%对75.0%,p = 0.043)。此外,腹腔镜组似乎比开放手术组恢复得更快。腹壁封闭装置易于附着在腹壁上,并允许快速手的移除和重新插入。

结论

我们的初步结果表明,使用腹壁封闭装置的手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术是一种有效且安全的手术方法,并且比开放性根治性肾切除术的侵入性更小。

相似文献

1
Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma using a new abdominal wall sealing device.使用新型腹壁封闭装置的手辅助腹腔镜肾癌根治术
J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):314-8.
2
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术
Aktuelle Urol. 2003 Jul;34(4):267-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41614.
3
Comparison of hand assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for suspected renal cell carcinoma.手辅助与标准腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗疑似肾细胞癌的比较
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1989-94.
4
Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾切除术:9年经验
J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1153-9.
5
Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison.腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾切除术治疗大型肾肿瘤:长期前瞻性比较
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.053.
6
Long-term follow-up of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗局限性肾细胞癌的长期随访
Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):652-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.032.
7
[Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases].后腹腔镜肾癌根治术——附43例报告
Ai Zheng. 2007 Jun;26(6):629-32.
8
Laparoscopic renal surgery: Ramathibodi Hospital experience.腹腔镜肾手术:拉玛蒂博迪医院的经验。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88(12):1825-32.
9
Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.经腹与腹膜后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):38-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000145886.26719.73.
10
Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术治疗病理分期为T1N0M0的肾细胞癌:5年生存率
J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):1984-8; discussion 1988-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.033.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy is a useful surgical treatment method for patients with excessive splenomegaly: A meta-analysis.手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术是治疗脾肿大患者的一种有效手术治疗方法:一项荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Feb 6;7(3):320-334. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i3.320.
2
Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy with a small incision for renal cell carcinoma: comparison with the conventional method.小切口后腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌:与传统方法的比较
J Negat Results Biomed. 2011 Aug 16;10:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-10-11.
3
Hand assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer bladder.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(2):191-5. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000034687.57052.d8.
4
A new multitool for hand-assisted advanced laparoscopic surgery (HALS).
Surg Endosc. 2003 Sep;17(9):1368-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8644-x. Epub 2003 Jun 25.
5
Grasping and dissecting instrument for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: development and early clinical experience.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1332-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9189-0. Epub 2002 May 3.