• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Developments in professional quality assurance towards quality improvement: some examples of peer review in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

van Weert C

机构信息

Visitatie Programme, Dutch National Institute for Quality Improvement in Health Care, CBO, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):239-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.239.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/12.3.239
PMID:10894196
Abstract

This study will explore new developments in three clinical peer review programmes in the UK and the visitatie programme in The Netherlands and how these programmes can be linked, in the future, with other quality systems. The information about the English peer review programmes was gathered by conducting four structured interviews with the programme coordinators (see Acknowledgements). Information about the Dutch visitatie programme was gathered by the author working with different visitatie programmes at the Dutch National Institute for Quality Improvement. Comparing new developments in the models of the Institute for Standardization of Organizations and the European Foundation for Quality Management, common changes are identified which seem to reflect elements viewed internationally as necessary in quality improvement. This study will examine if and how these elements are or will be included in the clinical peer review programmes in the UK and in visitatie in The Netherlands.

摘要

相似文献

1
Developments in professional quality assurance towards quality improvement: some examples of peer review in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):239-42. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.239.
2
Re-engineering trust: the adoption and adaption of four models for external quality assurance of health care services in western European health care systems.重塑信任:西欧医疗保健系统中医疗服务外部质量保证的四种模式的采用与适应
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):183-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.183.
3
A policy analysis of the introduction and dissemination of external peer review (visitatie) as a means of professional self-regulation amongst medical specialists in The Netherlands in the period 1985-2000.
Health Policy. 2001 Dec;58(3):191-213. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00158-0.
4
The EFQM excellence model: European and Dutch experiences with the EFQM approach in health care. European Foundation for Quality Management.欧洲质量管理基金会卓越模式:欧洲及荷兰在医疗保健领域应用欧洲质量管理基金会方法的经验。欧洲质量管理基金会。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):191-201. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.191.
5
External quality mechanisms for health care: summary of the ExPeRT project on visitatie, accreditation, EFQM and ISO assessment in European Union countries. External Peer Review Techniques. European Foundation for Quality Management. International Organization for Standardization.医疗保健的外部质量机制:欧盟国家中关于视察、认证、欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)和国际标准化组织(ISO)评估的ExPeRT项目总结。外部同行评审技术。欧洲质量管理基金会。国际标准化组织。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):169-75. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.169.
6
Raising the standard: improving quality.提升标准:提高质量。
Prof Nurse. 2004 Aug;19(12):14-7.
7
[Towards an accreditation system for the Dutch hospitals].[迈向荷兰医院认证体系]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Jan 9;143(2):89-93.
8
Joint Commission International accreditation: relationship to four models of evaluation.国际联合委员会认证:与四种评估模式的关系
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):243-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.243.
9
Quality management in medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands.医学专业中的质量管理:荷兰利用渠道和堤坝改善医疗保健服务
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 May;24(5):240-50. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30378-9.
10
Implementation of Releasing Time to Care - the productive ward.实施释放护理时间——高效病房。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Jul;17(5):647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01026.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of organisational external peer review on colorectal cancer treatment and survival in the Netherlands.组织外部同行评审对荷兰结直肠癌治疗和生存的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):850-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.814. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
2
Organizational, technical, physical and clinical quality standards for radiotherapy.放射治疗的组织、技术、物理和临床质量标准。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 Jun 3;17(4):190-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.05.001.
3
Clinical quality standards for radiotherapy.放射治疗临床质量标准。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2012;16(1):44-52. doi: 10.5114/wo.2012.27336. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
4
External assessment of health care.医疗保健的外部评估
BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):851-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7290.851.