• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沃尔索尔社区压疮风险计算器的有效性。

Validity of the Walsall Community Pressure Sore Risk Calculator.

作者信息

Chaloner D M, Franks P J

机构信息

Walsall Community Health Trust, Springside Community Unit, Pelsall.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 1999;8(17):1142-4, 1146, 1148 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.17.6505.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.1999.8.17.6505
PMID:10897696
Abstract

The Walsall Community Risk Score Calculator has been in use for the past 8 years. Outcomes from a trust-wide prevalence audit identified that this assessment tool may benefit from re-evaluation. This study examined the tool's validity and reliability and has resulted in some changes being made to the original score. To assess validity, a cross-sectional study of 720 patients was undertaken looking at the incidence of pressure damage, despite intervention, over a 12-week period. Using logistic regression analysis new weightings for each category were developed. This also led to the removal of one factor (bodily pain) which did not appear to contribute to increased risk of pressure damage. The updated score shows an improved prediction of pressure sore development compared with the existing method.

摘要

沃尔索尔社区风险评分计算器在过去8年中一直在使用。一项全信托范围的患病率审计结果表明,这个评估工具可能需要重新评估。本研究对该工具的有效性和可靠性进行了检验,并对原始评分进行了一些修改。为评估有效性,我们进行了一项横断面研究,观察了720名患者在12周内尽管接受了干预但仍发生压力性损伤的发生率。通过逻辑回归分析,为每个类别制定了新的权重。这也导致去除了一个似乎对压力性损伤风险增加没有影响的因素(身体疼痛)。与现有方法相比,更新后的评分对压疮发生的预测有所改善。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Walsall Community Pressure Sore Risk Calculator.沃尔索尔社区压疮风险计算器的有效性。
Br J Nurs. 1999;8(17):1142-4, 1146, 1148 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.17.6505.
2
Validity of the Walsall Community Pressure Sore Risk Calculator.沃尔索尔社区压疮风险计算器的有效性。
Br J Community Nurs. 2000 Jun;5(6):266, 268, 270, 272-6. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2000.5.6.7395.
3
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
4
An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.沃特洛压疮风险评估工具的评估
Br J Nurs. 2005;14(8):455-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.8.17930.
5
Skin alterations of intact skin and risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development in surgical patients: a cohort study.手术患者完整皮肤的改变及与压疮发生相关的危险因素:一项队列研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
6
Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.重症监护压力性溃疡风险评估:Braden 和 Waterlow 量表及两个重症监护病房主观评估的评分者间信度和效度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
7
Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?压疮风险评估量表是否有效?
J Tissue Viability. 2010 Nov;19(4):132-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
8
A conceptual model of pressure ulcer prevalence: MDS+ items and nutrition.压力性溃疡患病率的概念模型:最小数据集+项目与营养
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Feb;45(2):36-8, 40, 42-4.
9
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
10
Pressure sore prevention in hospital patients: a clinical audit.医院患者压疮的预防:一项临床审计
J Wound Care. 1999 Mar;8(3):129-31. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.3.25857.